From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: rm@tuxteam.de
Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user
Subject: gc question
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 11:14:11 +0200
Message-ID: <20110509091411.GA14837@seid-online.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1304931019 23553 80.91.229.12 (9 May 2011 08:50:19 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 08:50:19 +0000 (UTC)
To: guile-user@gnu.org
Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 09 10:50:14 2011
Return-path: <guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1QJMAM-0007Th-Ro
	for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 10:50:10 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37984 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1QJMAM-0001ay-0s
	for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 04:50:10 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48246)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rm@seid-online.de>) id 1QJMAF-0001X1-7F
	for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 04:50:03 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rm@seid-online.de>) id 1QJMAE-0004tY-Ge
	for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 04:50:03 -0400
Original-Received: from alextrapp1.equinoxe.de ([217.22.192.104]:48572
	helo=www.elogos.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rm@seid-online.de>) id 1QJMAE-0004s2-AB
	for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 04:50:02 -0400
Original-Received: by www.elogos.de (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 93ED49004B; Mon,  9 May 2011 11:14:11 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2)
X-Received-From: 217.22.192.104
X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Guile related discussions <guile-user.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guile-user>,
	<mailto:guile-user-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/guile-user>
List-Post: <mailto:guile-user@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guile-user-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user>,
	<mailto:guile-user-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:8612
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user/8612>


Dear list,

am I correct in assuming that the return value from
scm_from_locale_keyword("unknown"); 
won't ever be garbage collected od do I have to protect 
it?

 TIA Ralf Mattes