guile-2.0 - Character Encoding of Source Files - #! ... !# not working [low priority]

guile-2.0 - Character Encoding of Source Files - #! ... !# not working [low priority]

[David Pirotte]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 569 bytes --]

Hi

Just because I hit it today i am reporting this, but with low priority. I got into
this small problem [a very small and ridiculous example for the sake of
'demonstration']: the doc says [6.17.7]

	The coding declaration must appear in a scheme comment. It can either be a
	semicolon-initiated comment or a block #! comment. 

if you deposit the 3 attached files somewhere in your guile-load-path, 
chmod a+x test-iso-preceeding-comment

and execute it it's ok. but if you comment (use-modules (test-1)) and uncomment
(use-modules (test-2)) it's not

Cheers,
David


[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: test-1.scm --]
[-- Type: text/x-scheme, Size: 156 bytes --]

;;; -*- coding: iso-8859-1 -*- 
#!
this is working
!#

(define-module (test-1))

;; mais on le renvoit quand même filtré

(define (test)
  #t)


[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #3: test-2.scm --]
[-- Type: text/x-scheme, Size: 155 bytes --]

#! -*- coding: iso-8859-1 -*- 
this is not working
!#

(define-module (test-2))

;; mais on le renvoit quand même filtré

(define (test)
  #t)


[-- Attachment #4: test-iso-preceeding-comment --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 408 bytes --]

#!/bin/sh
# -*- scheme -*-
exec guile -e main -s $0 "$@"
!#

;; voilà, en bon français. here the iso-8859-1 chars are 'accepted'
;; because who read them is /bin/sh


;; this is ok
(use-modules (test-1))

;; but commenting the previous line and uncommenting this one will
;; lead to an error
;; (use-modules (test-2))

(define (main args)
  (display "Hello\n")
  (display args)
  (display "\nBye now\n")
  )

Re: guile-2.0 - Character Encoding of Source Files - #! ... !# not working [low priority]

[Andy Wingo]

On Thu 10 Mar 2011 02:06, David Pirotte <david@altosw.be> writes:

> Just because I hit it today i am reporting this, but with low priority. I got into
> this small problem [a very small and ridiculous example for the sake of
> 'demonstration']: the doc says [6.17.7]

Don't be bashful, that was a good bug!  Fixed in git.

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/