From: Tibi Turbureanu <tiberiuturbureanu@gmail.com>
To: guile-user@gnu.org
Cc: "Andy Wingo" <wingo@pobox.com>, "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Possible Memory Leak with stream-for-each
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 06:29:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100802032905.GD4698@portabil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3iq3vg9dg.fsf@unquote.localdomain>
Hello guys,
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 01:48:27PM +0200, Andy Wingo wrote:
> So, it's not the case that the beginning of the stream was being held on
> to. Which is a bad thing -- it means that somehow something in the
> middle was being held on to.
Andy, I remember you said at GHM that we might not use libgc correctly.
Related to this, I found some tips in README.QUICK:
[quote]
Replace calls to malloc by calls to GC_MALLOC, and calls to realloc
by calls to GC_REALLOC.
Define GC_DEBUG before including gc.h for additional checking.
[\quote]
We also have GC_malloc_* calls in Guile and maybe we should have only
GC_MALLOC_* calls so that the debugging mode can work (just defining
GC_DEBUG before including gc.h gives a segfault).
There is also a warning:
[quote]
Do not store the only pointer to an object in memory allocated
with system malloc, since the collector usually does not scan
memory allocated in this way.
[/quote]
But I haven't studied the code yet to tell if we respect this.
What do you guys think?
Tibi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-02 3:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-19 18:08 Possible Memory Leak with stream-for-each Abhijeet More
2010-07-20 20:36 ` Andy Wingo
2010-07-21 7:00 ` Tristan Colgate
2010-07-24 16:13 ` Ludovic Courtès
2010-07-24 16:32 ` Abhijeet More
2010-07-24 16:46 ` Abhijeet More
2010-07-26 9:36 ` Andy Wingo
2010-07-30 0:38 ` Abhijeet More
2010-07-31 11:48 ` Andy Wingo
2010-07-31 20:16 ` Abhijeet More
2010-08-11 16:57 ` Abhijeet More
2010-08-02 3:29 ` Tibi Turbureanu [this message]
2010-08-15 15:12 ` Heap profiler Ludovic Courtès
2010-09-02 12:49 ` Possible Memory Leak with stream-for-each Ludovic Courtès
2010-09-02 16:20 ` Julian Graham
2010-09-02 18:46 ` Andy Wingo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100802032905.GD4698@portabil \
--to=tiberiuturbureanu@gmail.com \
--cc=guile-user@gnu.org \
--cc=ludo@gnu.org \
--cc=wingo@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).