From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Cedric Cellier Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Thread and guile environment Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 13:22:01 +0200 Message-ID: <20100706112201.GA2877@securactive.net> References: <20100705082310.GA9492@apc> <87fwzxogdv.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1278415364 15875 80.91.229.12 (6 Jul 2010 11:22:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 11:22:44 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 06 13:22:42 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OW6Ea-0007rh-4M for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:22:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41549 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OW6EZ-0000yX-Ac for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 07:22:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44917 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OW6ER-0000yI-Cn for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 07:22:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OW6EP-0004EQ-Uo for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 07:22:31 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.5]:38367) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OW6EP-0004Ak-Gn for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 07:22:29 -0400 Original-Received: from apc.happyleptic.org (unknown [82.67.194.89]) by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7324FD48143 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 13:22:01 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ccellier.rd.securactive.lan (extranet.securactive.org [82.234.213.170]) by apc.happyleptic.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9EFE3347D for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 13:22:03 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from rixed by ccellier.rd.securactive.lan with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1OW6Dx-0001LB-PY for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:22:01 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87fwzxogdv.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:7964 Archived-At: -[ Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 08:52:44PM +0100, Neil Jerram ]---- > rixed@happyleptic.org writes: > Hm. I think I recall a bug to do with different threads starting in > different modules. Does it work if you add > > (define-module (guile-user)) > > at the start of your bug.scm ? Same behavior : ERROR: Unbound variable: hug Nobody's doing something similar ?