From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ondrej Zajicek Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Leap second bug? Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 21:45:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20080608194512.GA14504@localhost.localdomain> References: <20080607204054.GA7677@localhost.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1212954336 20222 80.91.229.12 (8 Jun 2008 19:45:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 19:45:36 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 08 21:46:19 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K5QqH-0000SY-5h for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Jun 2008 21:46:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38516 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K5QpT-0002TR-TA for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Jun 2008 15:45:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K5QpP-0002Su-PR for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jun 2008 15:45:23 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K5QpM-0002Sa-31 for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jun 2008 15:45:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56593 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K5QpL-0002SX-UW for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jun 2008 15:45:19 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp1.kolej.mff.cuni.cz ([78.128.192.10]:50844) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K5QpK-00025A-Sl for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jun 2008 15:45:19 -0400 X-Envelope-From: zajio1am@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain (feanorr.kolej.mff.cuni.cz [78.128.195.194]) by smtp1.kolej.mff.cuni.cz (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m58JjD5A031593 for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2008 21:45:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from zajio1am@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz) Original-Received: from santiago by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1K5QpE-0003w9-SF for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jun 2008 21:45:12 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080607204054.GA7677@localhost.localdomain> X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 (Etch) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 6.x (1) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:6604 Archived-At: --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 10:40:54PM +0200, Ondrej Zajicek wrote: > (date->str (time-utc->date (date->time-utc (str->date "01-01-2006")))) > -> "31-12-2005" >=20 > Is is a bug in leap second handling or is it a expected behavior? I forgot to mention that the problem appears in both Guile 1.6.8 and Guile 1.8.1 . --=20 Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email: santiago@crfreenet.org) OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net) "To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so." --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkhMNsgACgkQw1GB2RHercMxIACeKDGgKI35icfmA2H7j3o+f6pV ocAAn3/B+GsE0tbSe4DykoT+ivSmV5To =phP1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC--