From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bruce Korb Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: SCM_LENGTH ??? Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:12:54 -0800 Organization: Veritas Software Message-ID: <200501110812.54873.bkorb@veritas.com> References: <170174E4-6347-11D9-9F67-000A95909EE2@raeburn.org> Reply-To: bkorb@veritas.com NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1105461106 10673 80.91.229.6 (11 Jan 2005 16:31:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:31:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org, mckelvey@users.sourceforge.net, Marius Vollmer Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 11 17:31:36 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CoOgG-0005Iu-00 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 17:15:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CoOrp-0004HZ-L4 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 11:27:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CoOre-0004EK-Ng for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 11:27:26 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CoOrc-0004DQ-Qi for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 11:27:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CoOrc-0004Cw-Md for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 11:27:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [143.127.3.10] (helo=MTVMIME01.enterprise.veritas.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CoOdd-0004mm-7S for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 11:12:57 -0500 Original-Received: from megami.veritas.com (unverified) by MTVMIME01.enterprise.veritas.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with SMTP id ; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:12:55 -0800 Original-Received: from [172.22.12.213]([172.22.12.213]) (1374 bytes) by megami.veritas.com via sendmail with P:esmtp/R:smart_host/T:smtp (sender: ) id for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:12:55 -0800 (PST) (Smail-3.2.0.101 1997-Dec-17 #15 built 2001-Aug-30) Original-To: Ken Raeburn User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 In-Reply-To: <170174E4-6347-11D9-9F67-000A95909EE2@raeburn.org> Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:4047 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:4047 On Monday 10 January 2005 12:34 pm, Ken Raeburn wrote: > It won't work on all systems, but it should work on a lot of the > configurations we'd care most about. And if a macro is deprecated, the > overhead of a function call shouldn't be a big deal, as long as the > semantics are such that it can actually be implemented with a function > call. That would be great! Please! Thank you - Bruce _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user