From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: tomas@fabula.de Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: (slightly OT) Dynamic link w/o *.h [was: Guile questions] Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 16:07:30 +0200 Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <20040827140729.GA20959@www> References: <3508.67.36.45.214.1093546146.squirrel@67.36.45.214> <20040827100118.GA20107@www> <20040827135534.GF781@backlot.linas.org> <20040827135759.GG781@backlot.linas.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1093615694 6784 80.91.224.253 (27 Aug 2004 14:08:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 14:08:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Jim Norris , guile-user@gnu.org, tomas@fabula.de Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 27 16:07:48 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1C0hON-0007mz-00 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 16:07:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C0hT3-0001Tp-6g for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:12:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C0hSx-0001TQ-OX for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:12:31 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C0hSv-0001Sp-U6 for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:12:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C0hSv-0001Sb-P0 for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:12:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [217.22.192.104] (helo=www.elogos.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C0hO7-0000UB-OY for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:07:32 -0400 Original-Received: by www.elogos.de (Postfix, from userid 5002) id 6943614CB7; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 16:07:30 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Linas Vepstas Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040827135759.GG781@backlot.linas.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:3408 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:3408 On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 08:57:59AM -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 08:55:34AM -0500, Linas Vepstas was heard to remark: > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 12:01:18PM +0200, tomas@fabula.de was heard to remark: > > > pondering for a while about `glueless bindings' myself [...] > > I thought (and might be wrong) that the function signatures are in > > the debug (-g) info in the .o (the gnu elf 'stabs'), [...] And you might well be right, of course ;-) > and, of course, this is totally the wrong mailing list for this > discussion, you want to do that on the gcc mailing lists, and/or the > glibc mailing lists. That's why I tagged this as slightly off-topic. Nevertheless, the possibility of doing automatic run-time bindings (given e.g. debugging info) might be of interest here. Thanks for the pointers -- tomás _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user