From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: linas@linas.org (Linas Vepstas) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: (slightly OT) Dynamic link w/o *.h [was: Guile questions] Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 08:57:59 -0500 Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <20040827135759.GG781@backlot.linas.org> References: <3508.67.36.45.214.1093546146.squirrel@67.36.45.214> <20040827100118.GA20107@www> <20040827135534.GF781@backlot.linas.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1093615105 4862 80.91.224.253 (27 Aug 2004 13:58:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:58:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Jim Norris , guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 27 15:58:15 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1C0hF8-0006vq-00 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:58:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C0hJo-00066t-Fy for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:03:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C0hJk-00064t-7t for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:03:00 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C0hJj-00064O-Nj for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:02:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C0hJj-00064A-Iv for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:02:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [67.100.217.179] (helo=backlot.linas.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C0hEu-0007G7-5Q for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:58:00 -0400 Original-Received: by backlot.linas.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 86B261BC94; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 08:57:59 -0500 (CDT) Original-To: tomas@fabula.de Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040827135534.GF781@backlot.linas.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:3407 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:3407 On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 08:55:34AM -0500, Linas Vepstas was heard to remark: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 12:01:18PM +0200, tomas@fabula.de was heard to remark: > > pondering for a while about `glueless bindings' myself (along the > > lines: if gdb can do that... -- but gdb uses the source plus > > debugging info: I'd be happy to get that, and you seem to be even > > I thought (and might be wrong) that the function signatures are in > the debug (-g) info in the .o (the gnu elf 'stabs'), and that the > source wasn't needed. Not so? I wonder if 'objdump' already knows > this: this would imply that the ability to get the signatures is > already in a gas library, vastly simplifying your task. and, of course, this is totally the wrong mailing list for this discussion, you want to do that on the gcc mailing lists, and/or the glibc mailing lists. --linas -- pub 1024D/01045933 2001-02-01 Linas Vepstas (Labas!) PGP Key fingerprint = 8305 2521 6000 0B5E 8984 3F54 64A9 9A82 0104 5933 _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user