From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tom Lord Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user,gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: ITLA (was Re: Arch and Guile) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:04:02 -0800 (PST) Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200403011904.LAA20046@morrowfield.regexps.com> References: <200402292232.51103.clinton@unknownlamer.org> <87r7wdma3d.fsf@alice.rotty.yi.org> <87n0707icl.fsf_-_@alice.rotty.yi.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1078188781 16995 80.91.224.253 (2 Mar 2004 00:53:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 00:53:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org, ttn@glug.org, guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 02 01:52:52 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Axy9U-0004FA-00 for ; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 01:52:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Axy7N-0005hM-Kw for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 19:50:41 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1AxsOL-0007g2-Ue for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 13:43:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1AxsNn-0007Zv-8a for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 13:43:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [206.40.45.201] (helo=morrowfield.regexps.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1AxsNl-0007ZH-TX; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 13:43:14 -0500 Original-Received: (from lord@localhost) by morrowfield.regexps.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id LAA20046; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:04:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lord@morrowfield.regexps.com) Original-To: a.rottmann@gmx.at In-reply-to: <87n0707icl.fsf_-_@alice.rotty.yi.org> (message from Andreas Rottmann on Mon, 01 Mar 2004 15:27:38 +0100) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:2869 gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3470 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:2869 > From: Andreas Rottmann > Using Arch would also make stuff easier for the "mainstream" Guile > developers to maintain their stable and development branches: They > could have an guile--fixes--1.6 branch, wich they'd simple star-merge > into HEAD. Should work in this area start to take place, please let me know if I can help in any way. > I'm not totally clear what you mean here, and how that relates to an > Arch<->CVS gateway. Anyway, you might be interested in my ITLA > thingy[0]. You appear to have left out the footnote. I'd like to point out some info about the ITLA idea. ITLA is not, at it's core, tla specific -- it's a generic engine for making interactive Scheme programs, both CLI and GUI. See: http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-11/msg00291.html Particularly the section "How it Would Work" which begins: * How it Would Work ITLA would be written as an "extensible shell". Most likely, especially since arch is a GNU project, in Guile. SCSH, MzScheme, and Systas Scheme are other possibilities. It's architecture would somewhat resemble Emacs' in the following way: [....] The ITLA framework is one of the target applications for Pika Scheme but it will be a long time before Pika is ready to start implementing it. There's no reason not to start on the framework earlier, using Guile (and many good reasons to do so). -t _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user