* Debian packages for guile-gtk-1.2 CVS [not found] ` <m0k73tmb05.fsf@hobitin.ucw.cz> @ 2004-02-12 20:52 ` Daniel Skarda 2004-02-13 12:42 ` rm 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Daniel Skarda @ 2004-02-12 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: Hamish Moffatt Hello, I made unofficial Debian packages from guile-gtk-1.2 CVS. I started with original Hamish's packages from Debian unstable and made following modifications: * I renamed the packages to libgtk1.2-guile and libgtk1.2-guile-dev, since I felt that long package names (like libguilegtkglarea) are very hard to read and moreover there are already packages with names like libgtk- perl, libgtk-ruby16 so I guess this is more consistent with Debian naming conventions (I do not know if exactly these are explicit or not) * I made new packages for new library bindings to prevent increase dependencies of libgtk1.2-guile package. Now there is libglade0-guile, libgdk-pixbuf-guile and gtkglarea-guile. * The package has version 0.31+cvs20040128 deb http://www.ucw.cz/~0rfelyus/debian . deb-src http://www.ucw.cz/~0rfelyus/debian . I have not made many Debian packages in past, in fact I am quite new to this. So please have mercy when you judge my work. It is possible that I unintentionally broke some Debian packaging policies or made a mistake. I would appreciate any help or advice in this area. 0. _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Debian packages for guile-gtk-1.2 CVS 2004-02-12 20:52 ` Debian packages for guile-gtk-1.2 CVS Daniel Skarda @ 2004-02-13 12:42 ` rm 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: rm @ 2004-02-13 12:42 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: Hamish Moffatt, guile-user, guile-gtk-general On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 09:52:19PM +0100, Daniel Skarda wrote: > Hello, Hello Daniel, I think these should be: deb http://www.ucw.cz/~0rfelyus/debian / deb-src http://www.ucw.cz/~0rfelyus/debian / > > I have not made many Debian packages in past, in fact I am quite new to > this. So please have mercy when you judge my work. It is possible that I > unintentionally broke some Debian packaging policies or made a mistake. > I would appreciate any help or advice in this area. Hmm, maybe you should publish the deb-lines with explicit package names, with this setup you might also deliver things like tla to users. I'd prefer to get those (non-guile) packages from the official repositories. Anyway, thank's for the work Ralf Mattes > 0. > > > _______________________________________________ > Guile-user mailing list > Guile-user@gnu.org > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-02-13 12:42 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <m0y8s9o3et.fsf@hobitin.ucw.cz> [not found] ` <20040115120833.GA12617@cloud.net.au> [not found] ` <m0k73tmb05.fsf@hobitin.ucw.cz> 2004-02-12 20:52 ` Debian packages for guile-gtk-1.2 CVS Daniel Skarda 2004-02-13 12:42 ` rm
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).