* Debian packages for guile-gtk-1.2 CVS
[not found] ` <m0k73tmb05.fsf@hobitin.ucw.cz>
@ 2004-02-12 20:52 ` Daniel Skarda
2004-02-13 12:42 ` rm
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Skarda @ 2004-02-12 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: Hamish Moffatt
Hello,
I made unofficial Debian packages from guile-gtk-1.2 CVS. I started with
original Hamish's packages from Debian unstable and made following
modifications:
* I renamed the packages to libgtk1.2-guile and libgtk1.2-guile-dev, since
I felt that long package names (like libguilegtkglarea) are very hard to
read and moreover there are already packages with names like libgtk-
perl, libgtk-ruby16 so I guess this is more consistent with Debian
naming conventions (I do not know if exactly these are explicit or not)
* I made new packages for new library bindings to prevent increase
dependencies of libgtk1.2-guile package. Now there is libglade0-guile,
libgdk-pixbuf-guile and gtkglarea-guile.
* The package has version 0.31+cvs20040128
deb http://www.ucw.cz/~0rfelyus/debian .
deb-src http://www.ucw.cz/~0rfelyus/debian .
I have not made many Debian packages in past, in fact I am quite new to
this. So please have mercy when you judge my work. It is possible that I
unintentionally broke some Debian packaging policies or made a mistake.
I would appreciate any help or advice in this area.
0.
_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Debian packages for guile-gtk-1.2 CVS
2004-02-12 20:52 ` Debian packages for guile-gtk-1.2 CVS Daniel Skarda
@ 2004-02-13 12:42 ` rm
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: rm @ 2004-02-13 12:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: Hamish Moffatt, guile-user, guile-gtk-general
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 09:52:19PM +0100, Daniel Skarda wrote:
> Hello,
Hello Daniel,
I think these should be:
deb http://www.ucw.cz/~0rfelyus/debian /
deb-src http://www.ucw.cz/~0rfelyus/debian /
>
> I have not made many Debian packages in past, in fact I am quite new to
> this. So please have mercy when you judge my work. It is possible that I
> unintentionally broke some Debian packaging policies or made a mistake.
> I would appreciate any help or advice in this area.
Hmm, maybe you should publish the deb-lines with explicit package names, with
this setup you might also deliver things like tla to users. I'd prefer to get
those (non-guile) packages from the official repositories.
Anyway, thank's for the work
Ralf Mattes
> 0.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Guile-user mailing list
> Guile-user@gnu.org
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-02-13 12:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <m0y8s9o3et.fsf@hobitin.ucw.cz>
[not found] ` <20040115120833.GA12617@cloud.net.au>
[not found] ` <m0k73tmb05.fsf@hobitin.ucw.cz>
2004-02-12 20:52 ` Debian packages for guile-gtk-1.2 CVS Daniel Skarda
2004-02-13 12:42 ` rm
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).