unofficial mirror of guile-user@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludovic.courtes@laas.fr>
Cc: guile-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: cmod-play 1 available + modsup.h additions
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 14:37:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031114133735.GC16650@powergnu.laas.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1AKdia-0000cx-00@colo.agora-net.com>

Hi,

Today, 24 minutes, 28 seconds ago, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote:
> i'd like to keep them out of SCM_ namespace, actually, and tried for the
> "M" namespace, which is admittedly easy to stumble on inadvertantly by
> other code.  guile 1.4.x has SCM_ and GH_ already, maybe GHM_ (for guile
> high-level "module support") is better.  how does that sound?

I actually don't see the point in having different namespaces for Guile
things. :)

> since it's an additive change, introducing these macros does not raise
> compatibility issues, but of course there may be other criterion by
> which they will be rejected.  there's a lot of stuff in 1.4.x[1] that
> could easily be added to other guile branches but the will to do so has
> not yet materialized (and might never).  that's not something i can
> control so i don't worry about it, generally.

The doc snarfing example you gave is a nice thing.  Unfortunately, there
is no such thing in Guile 1.6.  Is there any reason for continuing
development for 1.4.x rather than working on 1.6.x?

Thanks,
Ludovic.


_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user


  reply	other threads:[~2003-11-14 13:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-13 21:55 cmod-play 1 available + modsup.h additions Thien-Thi Nguyen
2003-11-14  8:26 ` Ludovic Courtès
2003-11-14 13:10   ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2003-11-14 13:37     ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2003-11-14 17:38       ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2003-11-14 14:29   ` Marius Vollmer
2003-11-14 14:17 ` Marius Vollmer
2003-11-14 15:28   ` Does anyone have a better scm_string_hash ? Roland Orre
2003-11-14 15:51     ` Ludovic Courtès
2003-11-17  8:33       ` Roland Orre
2003-11-17 13:01         ` Ludovic Courtès
2003-11-17 15:42         ` Marius Vollmer
2003-11-17 16:02           ` Marius Vollmer
2003-11-17 16:29             ` Marius Vollmer
2003-11-17 16:48               ` Allister MacLeod
2003-11-17 17:57                 ` Marius Vollmer
2003-11-17 19:17                   ` OT: x86 assembly timings/size (was Re: Does anyone have a better scm_string_hash ?) Allister MacLeod
2003-11-17 21:27                     ` OT: x86 assembly timings/size Marius Vollmer
2003-11-19  9:04             ` Does anyone have a better scm_string_hash ? Ludovic Courtès
2003-11-19 15:02               ` Marius Vollmer
2003-11-14 17:40   ` cmod-play 1 available + modsup.h additions Thien-Thi Nguyen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031114133735.GC16650@powergnu.laas.fr \
    --to=ludovic.courtes@laas.fr \
    --cc=guile-user@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).