unofficial mirror of guile-user@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tomas@fabula.de
Cc: guile-user@gnu.org, ttn@glug.org
Subject: Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 11:26:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031027102602.GB18154@www> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200310242258.PAA04035@morrowfield.regexps.com>

On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 03:58:18PM -0700, Tom Lord wrote:
> 

[snip]

> The so-far (mostly) unasked question is whether we can achieve similar
> (practical, not theoretic) expressivity to those tweaked matchers
> _without_ climbing the chomsky hierarchy:  can we be fast and
> convenient at the same time?

It's not unasked. I've asked it myself, in several variations. One
variation I particularly like is whether there is a (practical) way
to let the regexp compiler decide how far to climb the Chomsky
ladder (and not to clutter/limit the `regexp language' or `the
interface' with such performance considerations).

Thanks for your insightful posts.

-- tomas


_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-10-27 10:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-23 13:37 Stupid module and pregexp questions MJ Ray
2003-04-23 14:56 ` Paul Jarc
2003-04-24 10:01   ` MJ Ray
2003-04-24 12:52 ` Andreas Rottmann
2003-04-24 13:15   ` MJ Ray
2003-04-24 13:36     ` Andreas Rottmann
2003-04-24 16:58       ` Marius Vollmer
2003-04-24 22:55         ` Andreas Rottmann
2003-04-24 17:58       ` MJ Ray
2003-04-28 16:06 ` Rob Browning
2003-04-28 16:44   ` MJ Ray
2003-04-28 17:03     ` Rob Browning
2003-04-28 17:51       ` MJ Ray
2003-04-28 18:18         ` Rob Browning
2003-04-28 18:07       ` Dr. Peter Ivanyi
2003-04-29 18:38         ` MJ Ray
2003-04-28 17:53   ` tomas
2003-04-28 17:12     ` Rob Browning
2003-04-28 17:55     ` MJ Ray
2003-04-29  8:12       ` Low level things in C or Scheme [was Stupid module and pregexp questions] tomas
2003-04-29 17:35         ` Thamer Al-Harbash
2003-04-29 19:34           ` Low level things in C or Scheme Mikael Djurfeldt
2003-04-29 20:24             ` Ken Anderson
2003-04-30  4:27           ` Low level things in C or Scheme [was Stupid module and pregexp questions] Robert Uhl
2003-04-30 13:27             ` Thamer Al-Harbash
2003-04-30  6:39           ` tomas
2003-04-29  0:45   ` Stupid module and pregexp questions Robert Uhl
2003-04-29 22:06     ` MJ Ray
2003-04-29 23:21       ` Tom Lord
2003-04-30  0:04         ` Ken Anderson
2003-04-30  6:48         ` tomas
2003-04-30  6:31           ` Tom Lord
2003-04-30  6:35             ` Tom Lord
2003-10-24 21:29             ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2003-10-24 22:30               ` Tom Lord
2003-10-26 18:38                 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2003-04-30  6:58           ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2003-04-30 10:34             ` tomas
2003-04-30 17:11               ` Tom Lord
2003-05-06  9:50                 ` tomas
2003-05-06  9:28                   ` Tom Lord
2003-05-08 11:47                     ` tomas
2003-10-24 21:45               ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2003-10-24 22:37                 ` Tom Lord
2003-10-26 18:47                   ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2003-10-27 10:48                 ` tomas
2003-05-05  5:11         ` Rob Browning
2003-05-05  6:18           ` Tom Lord
2003-05-05  7:47             ` Rob Browning
2003-05-05 17:33               ` Tom Lord
2003-05-05 19:37                 ` Rob Browning
2003-05-05 20:19                   ` Tom Lord
2003-10-24 22:26             ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2003-10-24 22:58               ` Tom Lord
2003-10-26 19:02                 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2003-10-27 10:26                 ` tomas [this message]
2003-10-27 14:19                 ` Dale P. Smith
2003-10-27 14:54                   ` rm
2003-10-28  0:57                     ` Robert Marlow
2003-10-28  1:59                       ` Tom Lord
2003-10-29  9:36                         ` Harri Haataja
2003-10-28  2:05                       ` lord
     [not found]                         ` <lord@morrowfield.regexps.com>
2003-10-28  2:23                           ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2003-04-30  4:38       ` Robert Uhl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031027102602.GB18154@www \
    --to=tomas@fabula.de \
    --cc=guile-user@gnu.org \
    --cc=ttn@glug.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).