From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Dale P. Smith" Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 09:19:56 -0500 Organization: Actron Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <20031027091956.190d8366.dsmith@actron.com> References: <877k9eobcv.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <877k96htat.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <200305050618.XAA10052@morrowfield.regexps.com> <200310242258.PAA04035@morrowfield.regexps.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1067273877 14514 80.91.224.253 (27 Oct 2003 16:57:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 16:57:57 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 27 15:29:48 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AE8NQ-0006WH-00 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 15:29:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AE8Jt-0002rH-ME for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 09:26:09 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AE8Fb-0007WV-Id for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 09:21:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AE8Ej-00067c-1I for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 09:21:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [207.170.141.97] (helo=mail.actron.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.24) id 1AE8Dv-00059H-2v for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 09:19:59 -0500 Original-Received: from TAG00604 ([192.168.0.216]) by mail.actron.com (8.12.5/8.9.3) with SMTP id h9RHGLeY015405 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 12:16:21 -0500 Original-To: guile-user@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <200310242258.PAA04035@morrowfield.regexps.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.5claws28 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:2335 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:2335 On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 15:58:18 -0700 (PDT) Tom Lord wrote: > The chomsky hierarchy points to some platonic truth that has real and > practical implications for programs. If you stick to the lower > levels of the hierarchy, you get better performance guarantees than if > you don't. Got any nice pointers to this chomsky hierarchy? Thanks! -Dale -- Dale P. Smith dsmith at actron dot com _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user