From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Compall Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Functions in libguile vs SRFIs Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 17:05:55 -0500 Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200307152205.h6FM5tw30073@csserver.evansville.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1058307181 7408 80.91.224.249 (15 Jul 2003 22:13:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 22:13:01 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 16 00:13:00 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19cY2e-0001vM-00 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 00:13:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19cY0E-0002QJ-OS for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 18:10:30 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19cXzN-0002Ej-0p for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 18:09:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19cXzH-00029f-0Q for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 18:09:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.195.228.35] (helo=csserver.evansville.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19cXvq-0000z0-BV for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 18:05:58 -0400 Original-Received: (from sc87@localhost) by csserver.evansville.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h6FM5tw30073; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 17:05:55 -0500 Original-To: guile-user@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:2085 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:2085 On the functions now duplicated (some with slight enhancements) between libguile and the SRFIs: Are the ones in libguile (going to be) deprecated? If not, are the SRFI versions preferred? If not, IMHO, they should be, for the sake of modularity (not to mention standards). -- Stephen Compall or S11 or sirian Too many people are thinking of security instead of opportunity. They seem more afraid of life than death. -- James F. Byrnes _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user