From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stan Pinte Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: segfault in scm_mark_subr_table () Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2003 19:51:08 -0400 Organization: Alto Software Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <20030601195108.132899d6.stan@altosw.be> References: <20030523110231.4915577b.stan@altosw.be> <87n0h1jxjl.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1054548188 28111 80.91.224.249 (2 Jun 2003 10:03:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 10:03:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 02 12:03:05 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19Mm8z-0007GL-00 for ; Mon, 02 Jun 2003 12:02:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19Mm46-0001UE-QA for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2003 05:57:18 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19Mm16-0000TF-DZ for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2003 05:54:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19Mm0w-0000NN-GN for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2003 05:54:05 -0400 Original-Received: from amsfep14-int.chello.nl ([213.46.243.22]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19MlyC-0008Aa-Fw for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2003 05:51:12 -0400 Original-Received: from pablo.altosw.be ([62.205.73.200]) by amsfep14-int.chello.nl SMTP <20030602095111.OQZM17933.amsfep14-int.chello.nl@pablo.altosw.be>; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 11:51:11 +0200 Original-To: Marius Vollmer In-Reply-To: <87n0h1jxjl.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.0pre1 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Original-cc: rlb@defaultvalue.org X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:2016 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:2016 On 01 Jun 2003 23:30:22 +0200 Marius Vollmer wrote: > Stan Pinte writes: > > > anyone having experience with that kind of segfaults? > > Hmm, yes, this sounds vaguely familiar. > > > segfault: > > gcc: 3.3 > > > > not segfault: > > gcc: 3.2.2 > > It might be the version of the compiler. Try compiling both Guile as > well as your code with -O0 (i.e., without optimization). Also, try > the -fno-strict-aliasing option. Please report back whether that helps. > > I think Guile HEAD and Guile 1.6.4 should work with GCC 3.3 now. Is > that right? Rob? indeed, compiling Guile-1.6.4, guile-gtk-1.2-0.31, ... with gcc 3.3 works perfectly...as well as running...the problem occurs only with gnome-guile. Stan. > > -- > GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405 > > > _______________________________________________ > Guile-user mailing list > Guile-user@gnu.org > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user > _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user