From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Clinton Ebadi Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Interpreter Sessions (Newbie) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 14:54:08 -0500 Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200302281454.08620.clinton@unknownlamer.org> References: <200302241650.24519.clinton@unknownlamer.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1046462003 11167 80.91.224.249 (28 Feb 2003 19:53:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 19:53:23 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18oqYs-0002r0-00 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 20:52:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18oqWL-0004Hd-08 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 14:50:13 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18oqVw-0004HN-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 14:49:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18oqVv-0004HB-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 14:49:48 -0500 Original-Received: from out005pub.verizon.net ([206.46.170.143] helo=out005.verizon.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18oqVv-0004H6-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 14:49:47 -0500 Original-Received: from vsynth ([151.196.173.12]) by out005.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.27 201-253-122-126-127-20021220) with ESMTP id <20030228194945.MLJG6910.out005.verizon.net@vsynth> for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 13:49:45 -0600 Original-Received: from clinton by vsynth with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18oqa9-0003H8-00 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 14:54:09 -0500 Original-To: User-Agent: KMail/1.4.2 In-Reply-To: X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out005.verizon.net from [151.196.173.12] at Fri, 28 Feb 2003 13:49:44 -0600 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:1697 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:1697 On Friday 28 February 2003 12:56, Paul Jarc wrote: > >> Hm... I've been using resolve-interface here, not resolve-module. > >> Does it make a difference? > > > > They do different things: > > I know that. What I'm not sure of is which one should be used with > make-module. resolve-interface was suggested by Marius Vollmer: > > But I wonder if resolve-module would work equally well. I suspect > that when the #:select and #:renamer areguments are not given, > resolve-interface is equivalent to resolve-module. They are equivalent when you don't use #:select or #:renamer (as far as I= can=20 tell from the source in ice-9/boot-9.scm) --=20 http://unknownlamer.org _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user