* different length list arguments for every and any
@ 2003-02-21 17:15 Paul Jarc
2003-02-21 17:39 ` david
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Paul Jarc @ 2003-02-21 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
every and any seem to allow their list arguments to have different
lengths, but this is not documented. Is it safe to rely on this
behavior?
paul
_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: different length list arguments for every and any
2003-02-21 17:15 different length list arguments for every and any Paul Jarc
@ 2003-02-21 17:39 ` david
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: david @ 2003-02-21 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 12:15:16PM -0500, Paul Jarc wrote:
> every and any seem to allow their list arguments to have different
> lengths, but this is not documented. Is it safe to rely on this
> behavior?
That behaviour is documented in SRFI-1, which is the reference
specification for those functions.
http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-1/srfi-1.html
--
David Allouche | GNU TeXmacs -- Writing is a pleasure
Free software engineer | http://www.texmacs.org
http://ddaa.net | http://alqua.com/tmresources
david@allouche.net | allouche@texmacs.org
TeXmacs is NOT a LaTeX front-end and is unrelated to emacs.
_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-02-21 17:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-02-21 17:15 different length list arguments for every and any Paul Jarc
2003-02-21 17:39 ` david
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).