From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Matt Hellige Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Continuations: possible newbie question Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 20:42:29 -0600 Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <20021218204229.A26447@metro.immute.net> References: <20021218121410.A24945@metro.immute.net> <87n0n2hmbv.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1040266726 23485 80.91.224.249 (19 Dec 2002 02:58:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 02:58:46 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18OqtZ-00066e-00 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 03:58:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18OqsS-0004Zd-02 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 21:57:36 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18Oqs6-0004VM-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 21:57:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18Oqs4-0004RT-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 21:57:13 -0500 Original-Received: from immute.net ([65.164.210.194]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18Oqs3-0004Qs-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 21:57:11 -0500 Original-Received: (from matt@localhost) by immute.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA26474 for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 20:42:29 -0600 Original-To: guile-user@gnu.org Mail-Followup-To: guile-user@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <87n0n2hmbv.fsf@zagadka.ping.de>; from mvo@zagadka.ping.de on Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 01:41:24AM +0100 X-Mailer-Holy-War: Get Mutt, it bites! X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:1461 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:1461 [Marius Vollmer ] > Matt Hellige writes: > > > On the other hand, I'll probably still not end up using this technique > > to implement my call-backs, given the performance penalties and so on. > > I hope I can just shuffle things around a bit in my native code... > > I would not worry about performance too early. If you invoke one > continuation for every key press by the user, that should be no > problem. Always good advice, of course. In fact I have implemented it that way for now. In the end, I think performance will be less of a concern for me than reliability. I admit that I am still somewhat suspicious of non-linear continuations and C code... :) So it may change in the future, but for now with my newly rebuilt libguile, it works like a charm exactly as we've discussed. Thanks all for your help and advice. Matt -- Matt Hellige matt@immute.net http://matt.immute.net _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user