From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Dale P. Smith" Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: What if Guile changed its license to be LGPL? Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 17:57:46 -0400 Organization: Altus Technologies Corporation Sender: guile-user-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <20020605175746.3e4b3d20.dsmith@altustech.com> References: <87elfmu98g.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1023314835 28340 127.0.0.1 (5 Jun 2002 22:07:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 22:07:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mvo@zagadka.ping.de Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17Fivv-0007Mr-00 for ; Thu, 06 Jun 2002 00:07:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17Fip6-0008Ig-00; Wed, 05 Jun 2002 18:00:08 -0400 Original-Received: from 208-40-56-34.corecomm.net ([208.40.56.34] helo=borg.altus.cc) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17FinL-0008Dm-00 for ; Wed, 05 Jun 2002 17:58:20 -0400 Original-Received: from sparky (oh-strongsville5b-143.clvhoh.adelphia.net [24.54.110.143]) by borg-eth1.altus.cc (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id g55LvoY01972; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 17:57:51 -0400 Original-To: guile-user@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87elfmu98g.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.6claws16 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu) Errors-To: guile-user-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:543 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:543 On 04 Jun 2002 21:36:31 +0200 Marius Vollmer wrote: > > So, here comes the hypothetical questions: If we would change the > license of Guile to be the Lesser GPL, would you stop using it? > (Please reply only when your answer is "yes".) > > What specifically would make you stop using it? (I.e., "LGPL would > require me to distribute a link-kit, and I can't do that.") The (soon to be released) mod_guile will be using the Guile license because (so I'm told) that the Apache license and the GPL are incompatible. I'm not sure if the LGPL will be able to serve. -Dale -- Dale P. Smith Senior Systems Consultant, | Treasurer, Altus Technologies Corporation | Cleveland Linux Users Group dsmith@altustech.com | http://cleveland.lug.net 440-746-9000 x339 | _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user