From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bill Schottstaedt Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: The Guile license and the use of LGPL libs (like GMP). Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 04:38:22 -0700 Sender: guile-user-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200205171138.EAA27321@cmn14.stanford.edu> References: <87vg9oqf5b.fsf_-_@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 3.3 v148.2.1) Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1021635834 646 127.0.0.1 (17 May 2002 11:43:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 11:43:54 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 178g9K-0000AJ-00 for ; Fri, 17 May 2002 13:43:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 178g5H-0002xM-00; Fri, 17 May 2002 07:39:44 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-mail.stanford.edu ([171.64.197.135]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 178g41-0002k8-00 for ; Fri, 17 May 2002 07:38:25 -0400 Original-Received: from cmn14.stanford.edu (cmn14.stanford.edu [171.64.197.163]) by cm-mail.stanford.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g4HBcOl06021 for ; Fri, 17 May 2002 04:38:24 -0700 Original-Received: (from bil@localhost) by cmn14.stanford.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id EAA27321 for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2002 04:38:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Nextstep-Mailer: Mail 3.3 [m68k] (Enhance 2.2p2) Original-Received: by NeXT.Mailer (1.148.2.1) Original-To: guile-user@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:453 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:453 > I suspect people in embedded > environments (the target audience for whom LGPL is problematic) don't > care about bignums. I do, or I'm confused about what "embedded" refers to -- I need the Scheme-side equivalent of "off_t" (long long -- 64 bit ints) in a context where file sizes go over 2^31 bytes. _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user