From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Roel Janssen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: [Wikidata] [ANN] nomunofu v0.1.0 Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 13:34:08 +0100 Message-ID: <1b622fece35a24fb522700922e3e5444f2e84dc7.camel@gnu.org> References: <3C3055B6-0BDC-444B-832F-C67477535E35@openlinksw.com> <20191223085617.GA14347@tuxteam.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="125264"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 (3.34.2-1.fc31) To: tomas@tuxteam.de, guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 23 13:34:31 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ijMus-000WPd-0A for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 13:34:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56280 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ijMuq-0005fF-Tu for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 07:34:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43879) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ijMua-0005eg-PD for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 07:34:13 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55432) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ijMua-0002B9-3d; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 07:34:12 -0500 Original-Received: from 2001-1c02-0b03-a700-f532-4553-7f2a-9b68.cable.dynamic.v6.ziggo.nl ([2001:1c02:b03:a700:f532:4553:7f2a:9b68]:43024) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ijMuZ-0003hB-O1; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 07:34:11 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20191223085617.GA14347@tuxteam.de> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:15970 Archived-At: On Mon, 2019-12-23 at 09:56 +0100, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 06:36:06PM -0500, Ted Thibodeau Jr via General Guile > related discussions wrote: > > [...] > > > Hi, Amirouche -- > > > > Kingsley's points about tuning Virtuoso to use available > > RAM [1] and other system resources are worth looking into, > > but a possibly more important first question is -- > > > > Exactly what version of Virtuoso are you testing? > > > > If you followed the common script on Ubuntu 18.04, i.e., -- > > > > sudo apt update > > > > sudo apt install virtuoso-opensource > > Hi, Ted > > I see you do have a stake in the game. That's fine, since having > a good technical discussion should be independent of that. So > thanks for chiming in! > > > -- then you likely have version 6.1.6 of VOS, the Open Source > > Edition of Virtuoso, which shipped 2012-08-02 [2], and is far > > behind the latest version of both VOS (v7.2.5+) and Enterprise > > Edition (v8.3+)! > > Wouldn't that be something your company could contribute to > Ubuntu/Debian? Contact the package maintainers and help keeping > the free version of Virtuoso up to snuff on those platforms? > > A rising tide, etc? > > > You can also try Enterprise Edition at no cost for 30 days [5]. > > I think it's somewhat unfair to try to compare a freshly > done free project with an established commercial one. > > > I'll be interested to hear your new results, with a current build, > > and with proper INI tuning in place. > > Why not assist Amirouche on that part? After all, you have > much easier access to Virtuoso expertise, and me, at least, > rather prefer Amirouche to spend his time tuning his wonderful > free creatures than tuning Virtuoso ;-P (of course, he'll end > up doing what he enjoys most, I'd hope!). > This might already help: I packaged Virtuoso OSE 7.2.5 for GNU Guix. The documentation of Virtuoso OSE provides enough information to tune it quite well. (I've been running Virtuoso OSE (from a GNU Guix install) for about three years now, and am quite happy with its performance). Cheers, Roel