From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: jbranso@dismail.de Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Using Guile for soft-realtime Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2021 19:05:55 +0000 Message-ID: <19bcb6ba0e888673930ff6238130fd54@dismail.de> References: <87v9bmfgja.fsf@clara> <87a6vnuqrf.fsf@clara> <87v9cmrbom.fsf@dismail.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17725"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: "Olivier Dion" , guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 24 20:06:26 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l3kiQ-0004Vn-9z for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 20:06:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58630 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l3kiP-0001xq-CZ for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 14:06:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56296) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l3ki5-0001wi-Gr for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 14:06:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]:48202) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l3ki2-0003Gr-GA for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 14:06:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 42429ab0; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 20:05:56 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h= mime-version:date:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from :message-id:subject:to:in-reply-to:references; s=20190914; bh=XB IH1fYVgziR+kTcI+CZLgUYUXpONy2Dde5IGreJKPo=; b=O5R6OgfR1E35xLhy7q Erc8M5RQ70zNkTIonn9bva6JzKF90gBUSjXy3/qu5F9cpKSH3SJ6MWl/fcq7S27z pPJt8rT/x7d9cQNFuvRR/X9pqx12tr+9XlsJ70N9nu7KU3qFPX94AiDj88tbQtqp TN9DmBC89x3P3QlJJCNou6aQVZwyziBvO3hNcX0UFIvGH24WwbDHsdVaMHR+4EqL 51XezM4IgvchVOsYCLS6FvBHHDI3dmMgX+A8F4ywgdlzi7qQiL0lPtSPa7m8Dsv9 EbAUkduSq8keTqgH3Sefn7W+34GP10J5j8ftTTxy46o+P5FNL8pAdDcKHSX8Zd69 n9WA== Original-Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 151e3384; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 20:05:56 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id a2f19d64; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 20:05:56 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 8bf57c83 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Sun, 24 Jan 2021 20:05:55 +0100 (CET) X-Mailer: RainLoop/1.14.0a In-Reply-To: <87v9bmfgja.fsf@clara> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=78.46.223.134; envelope-from=jbranso@dismail.de; helo=mx1.dismail.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.user:17192 Archived-At: Awesome! Well done chap! Jolly good sport!=0A=0AJanuary 24, 2021 11:25 = AM, "Olivier Dion" wrote:=0A=0A> On Sun, 27 Dec= 2020, Joshua Branson via General Guile related discussions =0A> wrote:=0A> =0A>> Hey Olivier!=0A>> =0A>> I've heard that guil= e is generally faster than python, but there are=0A>> some other schemes = that are faster, notably chez scheme.=0A> =0A> Yes. I remember seing some= where that Guile is much more energy=0A> efficiant than Python. It's a sh= ame that the latter is more popular=0A> than the former.=0A> =0A>> I will= also say that Andy Wingo (one of the guile maintainers) is=0A>> working = on making guile code "within" an order of magnitude of the speed=0A>> of = C code. I would say to try to build your program in guile and post=0A>> b= ack here.=0A> =0A> Well the software in question is a video game engine. = But I managed to=0A> integrate Guile into the engine, deactivating the Gu= ile context in=0A> critical section of C code. Work like a charm!=0A> =0A= > --=0A> Olivier Dion=0A> PolyMtl