From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lynn Winebarger Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Threads and asyncs Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 18:52:36 -0500 Sender: guile-user-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <19276.5931053602$1031010979@news.gmane.org> References: <87it1oglmq.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <200209022324.QAA08246@morrowfield.regexps.com> <200209022336.QAA08304@morrowfield.regexps.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1031010979 10607 127.0.0.1 (2 Sep 2002 23:56:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 23:56:19 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17m13K-0002ky-00 for ; Tue, 03 Sep 2002 01:56:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17m14q-0004gH-00; Mon, 02 Sep 2002 19:57:52 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17m13o-0004MC-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2002 19:56:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17m13m-0004KF-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2002 19:56:47 -0400 Original-Received: from rockridge.uits.indiana.edu ([129.79.1.74]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17m13j-0004HM-00; Mon, 02 Sep 2002 19:56:43 -0400 Original-Received: from logchain.uits.indiana.edu (logchain.uits.indiana.edu [129.79.1.77]) by rockridge.uits.indiana.edu (8.12.1/8.12.1/IUPO) with ESMTP id g82Nuc4f001442; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 18:56:38 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from locke.free-expression.org (dial-124-83.dial.indiana.edu [156.56.124.83]) by logchain.uits.indiana.edu (8.12.1/8.12.1/IUPO) with SMTP id g82NubDH004121; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 18:56:37 -0500 (EST) Original-To: Tom Lord , rlb@defaultvalue.org, guile-devel@gnu.org, guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] In-Reply-To: <200209022336.QAA08304@morrowfield.regexps.com> Errors-To: guile-user-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:902 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:902 On Monday 02 September 2002 18:36, Tom Lord wrote: > > If Guile never budges on the stack issue, I would still be > > inclined to see it as an implementation optimized for cases > > when the C stack is used heavily. > > And, not to reopen old wounds or restart old fights --- You were making sense right up until this part. Lynn _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user