From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Matt Wette Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 12:09:32 -0800 Message-ID: <16D13ACE-8369-4061-B287-E63F75F36D3A@gmail.com> References: <2e4e293e-618e-809a-2eff-31576319ea61@gmx.de> <874lzod28a.fsf@web.de> <6deb1610-e31b-b5c2-e9c9-95a2289af216@gmx.de> <87mvdfs6mh.fsf@web.de> <7F3F093F-C8FF-4448-AE69-462E07446A7B@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1488571806 2628 195.159.176.226 (3 Mar 2017 20:10:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 20:10:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: Amirouche Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 03 21:10:01 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cjtWY-0008JI-2x for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2017 21:09:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60074 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjtWc-0006gP-E5 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2017 15:10:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34844) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjtWH-0006ed-5E for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2017 15:09:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjtWC-0002aB-FR for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2017 15:09:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pg0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22e]:35573) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjtWC-0002a1-8T for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2017 15:09:36 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pg0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id b129so47232613pgc.2 for ; Fri, 03 Mar 2017 12:09:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=5iG53CnHZv6zS8S+BwOzXCyuPruZQY3368J71twcHq0=; b=hsFk/R7rGvkxmCLOZzYW7CyBTH8Fa2+lSRwK5l7kv6U5uCAUCS/bL/oxlvH1vde50V kpVk/5qiMw1m6DOiJou3DrzraO6zcx5bTm7P6UoYb2bvJ8QdIjeoKj6ryFqB/q2TU7Z9 ptoHwXjSpdp17toVyX1sVuJc9o1OXORyQpcu3/ZsssSJIiTxd6BMYxRS/02TXRAbPVTy 9WePsrwU0ZlF/9w+IqTuz71o9dRhC88HDfvG+GPEpXq6borhlqPq2w5sHEMEnqXUBSiS Nj/94yCyE3HMN3/Jq2ZKHcAxcgf/sh6VLChlTgeCD2BM4z9gRzHVNvjtkcB7QKFSyRvn JgMw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=5iG53CnHZv6zS8S+BwOzXCyuPruZQY3368J71twcHq0=; b=LigTPGxPAitYcxVWZU3bCmIZ2TJ0QXLotTHaObEcuIiq0wOlJUHSf8kaw4GAZY/6rb VTymYh2L7La0duB6hAu3nZ67UqfOAxPFE1agDpUdTJEkCkJr/tygur2k1N9irkT2ffje HbjUpcoACxJScl3RaUEFcbbeK64QxMGD9Heacjam5bI4s1murQm9XR5qGyqOItD0r534 vflbLBKtJSkakPnXP7BZsCnDioZmZ0JxEHyvTtW4d75E42KF5VW+O0tdmF1fWMpMFVzD 7BqFJx0J6XTgYhHc52rtZ2PS3Awgt0ODA2JaimRhwBkbXJmPHx1LBLAzlFHRCJYYpcde mRKw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mz706VjZsc3AKwRoSLLzkJ5inublT9cMK3p7YzUBlREHRnn8Mjbb9xBRizKJDbyg== X-Received: by 10.84.229.76 with SMTP id d12mr6802791pln.21.1488571774929; Fri, 03 Mar 2017 12:09:34 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.2.114] (216-165-236-44.championbroadband.com. [216.165.236.44]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l71sm25200999pga.7.2017.03.03.12.09.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Mar 2017 12:09:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22e X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:13394 Archived-At: > On Mar 3, 2017, at 11:16 AM, Amirouche = wrote: >> Now that the C preprocessor in NYACC/C99 is more robust I could start = looking at generating some sort of =E2=80=9CFFI helper=E2=80=9D = functionality. I have been thinking about this problem on and off for a = while. Completely automating things might be tough, but a =E2=80=9Chelper= =E2=80=9D would probably go a long way. > Are you aware of scheme-bytestructures [0] that's what we are using > in guile-git. If you target that API to wrap C structs, it would be = helpful. >=20 > [0] https://github.com/TaylanUB/scheme-bytestructures = Cloned it. Thanks for the reference. =E2=80=94 Matt