unofficial mirror of guile-user@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Han-Wen Nienhuys  <hanwen@xs4all.nl>
Subject: C++ declaration style programming?
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 23:17:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16397.43262.881852.180514@localhost.localdomain> (raw)


Hi there,

I just realized that one of the things that I dislike about Scheme is
that my habit of naming intermediate results (which I inherited from
C++) leads to deep nesting.

Usually in C++, I do

  int var1 = something ();
  int var2 = something (var1);  
  int var3 = something (var1, var2);  
    etc.

in Scheme, this translates quite well to (let* ) :

(let*
  ((var1 (something))
   (var2 (something var1))
   (var3 (something var1 var2)))
  .. )

However, it doesn't work so well when I mix commands with
declarations, eg.


  int var1 = something ();
  var1 += 2; 
  int var2 = something (var1);
  var2 += var1;
  int var3 = something (var1, var2);  
    etc.

I would like to have some macro, where I can write the Scheme analogon
like

 (begin-let*
  (def var1 (something))
  (set! var1 (+ var1 2))
  (def var2 (something var1))
  (set! var2 (+ var2 var1))
  (def var3 (something var1 var2))
  ...  )


This can presumably be done by writing a macro begin-let* that expands
the statement list in a suitably nested let*

However, I was wondering whether there exists a standard library
syntax mechanism that lets me write code in this fashion.

-- 

 Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   hanwen@xs4all.nl   |   http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen 



_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user


             reply	other threads:[~2004-01-20 22:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-20 22:17 Han-Wen Nienhuys [this message]
2004-01-21  3:58 ` C++ declaration style programming? Viktor Pavlenko
2004-01-21 12:40   ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2004-01-21  4:57 ` Issac Trotts
2004-01-21  5:00 ` Stephen Compall
2004-01-21 12:45   ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2004-01-21  5:03 ` Lynn Winebarger
2004-01-21 21:46 ` Keith Wright
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-21 14:22 Viktor Pavlenko
2004-01-21 14:26 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2004-01-21 15:41 Viktor Pavlenko
2004-01-21 16:06 ` Paul Jarc
2004-01-22  2:24 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2004-01-22  4:28   ` Viktor Pavlenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16397.43262.881852.180514@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=hanwen@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=hanwen@cs.uu.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).