From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Han-Wen Nienhuys Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: modules, 2nd try. Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 13:15:51 +0200 Sender: guile-user-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <15756.21735.215858.565781@blauw.xs4all.nl> References: <15751.43551.895093.230090@blauw.xs4all.nl> <15754.59777.585302.757918@meddo.cs.uu.nl> Reply-To: hanwen@cs.uu.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1032607752 19719 127.0.0.1 (21 Sep 2002 11:29:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 11:29:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17siRi-00057u-00 for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 13:29:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17siRD-0006ej-00; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 07:28:39 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17siBV-00049E-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 07:12:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17siBP-00048h-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 07:12:24 -0400 Original-Received: from smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.138]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17siBN-00048C-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 07:12:18 -0400 Original-Received: from blauw.xs4all.nl (blauw.xs4all.nl [213.84.26.127]) by smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g8LBC9kv073429; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 13:12:10 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Neil Jerram In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 7.05 under Emacs 21.2.1 Errors-To: guile-user-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:1065 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:1065 neil@ossau.uklinux.net writes: > One caveat that just occurred to me: with either variant (yours or > mine) of this design, I'm not sure that a variable in an inner scope > will correctly shadow a variable with the same name in an outer > scope. In your design, it depends on how the module system resolves > conflicts between multiple imports. but variables in the current module always get precedence, right? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | hanwen@cs.uu.nl | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user