From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Christopher Howard Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: SRFIs Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 06:49:04 -0800 Message-ID: <1505659744.30946.10.camel@qlfiles.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ygwLK3qvnIUd4rodpsjl" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1505659789 2139 195.159.176.226 (17 Sep 2017 14:49:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 14:49:49 +0000 (UTC) To: Guile User Mailing List Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 17 16:49:43 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dtatC-0000In-Su for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 16:49:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60863 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dtatK-0004LU-4s for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 10:49:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46706) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dtass-0004L8-Ob for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 10:49:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dtaso-0000RP-6d for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 10:49:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([95.128.36.42]:25106) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dtasn-0000Qu-UH for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 10:49:18 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by ext-mx-out003.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8D6540120 for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 16:49:14 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kolabnow.com; h= mime-version:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from :subject:subject:message-id:received:received:received; s= dkim20160331; t=1505659750; x=1505659772; bh=JldcYxxZu+Yez+Rm25N atpXCEGW6p8Usx9FJeXUFfB4=; b=JCpRYOzhrV3iIZam8x3aNXnvbBUskUAQqSN G1JnhncFy1ed9Qh9quObBnv/laxH+7CI7yxX5b2Jkw45xidxuZ+GWh/zmUgIhKR6 7ntDhmecxl3FxuaC4ikzixaRwvgGevisw5XL8uC3RGQiUF9kQsPLjqYT9/lqY+rO JEAi8StXHRDR6jXQ45TQjvtZRjpUg/OF8KYGIdGt9Qfjelv+yDYJQ1Xyx23Y3FlS 84j9Ql4szXkuPManoPC6y0/VQkYav140MHQOkLcLk5UhSMRmz0G2yI1q82A36vOW wl13Q6sf46Bsr/zcxoJQqKT02ykkLdm+4b4G/+PO2Z0PdaowVA/t9tXcWde+aUKb bJnU7AoZ4wnF46OWZympsr7QVarRC9oHQm7VCRyl72X8S3mFimCBgjo7Q27qTfqd Wjm3OOofgpHCd7+Ti38XsX46YZrlnOhg2nZFebo7rviP87JIG7k6IEoyqXYkCy3w PuCBsYw0rtjMLrOBHmcC15bXa2s4VqUktnrN84fs+uAUETa+NsGWxvkvR+1BpFk8 pRlQZYFAnRKEnlkVmuiiNwoanxPBPi4fMeaxN8Rq1+4Jrb X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mykolab.com Original-Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ext-mx-out003.mykolab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VuTawsrOD3fo for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 16:49:10 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from int-mx001.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.13.1]) by ext-mx-out003.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E635400F8 for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 16:49:10 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ext-subm002.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.6.2]) by int-mx001.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 709E3F6 for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 16:49:10 +0200 (CEST) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 95.128.36.42 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:14163 Archived-At: --=-ygwLK3qvnIUd4rodpsjl Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I was just wondering if Guile developers are planning to implement all the SRFIs eventually, or if they are just picking and choosing a few here and there? Put another way, is it just a matter of someone volunteering the time to do each SRFI, or are some not being done on purpose? --=20 https://qlfiles.net https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/en/ --=-ygwLK3qvnIUd4rodpsjl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEE3cRyrLOhI3rPcNVUee7NbCP9XMUFAlm+i2AACgkQee7NbCP9 XMXkpQf/fsCLCpSIq/ckqllmp4J9bwl0+iGzt5CeZzWz945lrBOkHWBe5SIWnv/D nSm71R4RVVMbFTTJ99Pw0sLF1s0bCVYWCQ1ATDMhr4yLQE5udzIsXc5Uh/MliwEe dITQLNDyM+lI8FbIkJDuxo+gN1bPP7o+HFPzEA8rHAl5wCvh17s+zuUIlgfgxpYj XoxXVLAe+gF5PHQ0i9qAQVILbB3TkPYX7L99Qr2Posh507FmF3fPP9HJiZyb497s WF2AgDa3ynGHLyxML5c4nFy9YHZDfm8ypWurBzXDv2FFJ65/S4KNQh5Is0SGfgNf 6TuwD3jE14/f5KNCDy7q3/FTI+29BQ== =fp2l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ygwLK3qvnIUd4rodpsjl--