From: Nala Ginrut <nalaginrut@gmail.com>
To: Carlos Pita <carlosjosepita@gmail.com>
Cc: guile-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: A couple of questions about goops method parameters
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 16:32:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1409905923.9245.5.camel@Renee-desktop.suse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAELgYhdnJMv6yoKafrRinTVjUD2X-oZO76YqMpXpRpQgYoDpQA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Carlos!
On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 23:05 -0300, Carlos Pita wrote:
> 2) What is the relationship between the lambda* family and methods?
> Are methods restricted in the sense that they can't aspire to get the
> greater flexibility of lambda* parameter handling? Maybe because of
> the way dispatching is done?
>
IMO, when you have lambda*, you never need define-method. Actually, I
want to say, once you have such FP features, you don't need OOP anymore.
You can mix them while programming, but you don't have to.
Anyway, if you try to avoid to use GOOPS someday, you have to handle
dispatching by yourself. ;-)
> Thank you very much in advance for any help.
>
> Best regards
> --
> Carlos
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-05 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-03 2:05 A couple of questions about goops method parameters Carlos Pita
2014-09-03 15:49 ` Carlos Pita
2014-09-03 16:47 ` Marko Rauhamaa
2014-09-03 18:05 ` Carlos Pita
2014-09-03 16:20 ` Panicz Maciej Godek
2014-09-05 8:32 ` Nala Ginrut [this message]
2014-09-05 12:47 ` Carlos Pita
2014-09-05 19:03 ` Panicz Maciej Godek
2014-09-05 19:12 ` David Thompson
2014-09-05 19:35 ` Panicz Maciej Godek
2014-09-05 19:55 ` David Thompson
2014-09-05 20:10 ` Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer
2014-09-05 20:50 ` David Thompson
2014-09-07 10:33 ` Neil Jerram
2014-09-07 15:27 ` Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer
2014-09-05 20:10 ` Panicz Maciej Godek
2014-09-05 20:18 ` Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer
2014-09-05 20:37 ` Panicz Maciej Godek
2014-09-05 20:51 ` Marko Rauhamaa
2014-09-05 21:53 ` Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer
2014-09-05 22:26 ` Marko Rauhamaa
2014-09-05 20:44 ` Marko Rauhamaa
2014-09-05 21:08 ` Panicz Maciej Godek
2014-09-05 22:14 ` Marko Rauhamaa
2014-09-06 8:53 ` Panicz Maciej Godek
2014-09-06 10:44 ` Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer
2014-09-06 11:27 ` Marko Rauhamaa
2014-09-06 11:54 ` Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer
2014-09-06 23:46 ` Panicz Maciej Godek
2014-09-07 0:20 ` Marko Rauhamaa
2014-09-07 12:57 ` Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer
2014-09-07 13:58 ` Marko Rauhamaa
2014-09-07 16:46 ` Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer
2014-09-07 19:49 ` Marko Rauhamaa
2014-09-07 23:13 ` Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer
[not found] ` <CAPjoZoc7X7s+keog6avP62yvgJyQ3Ma_jomhw6xQq_rK9jnhVw@mail.gmail.com>
2014-09-06 16:57 ` Nala Ginrut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1409905923.9245.5.camel@Renee-desktop.suse \
--to=nalaginrut@gmail.com \
--cc=carlosjosepita@gmail.com \
--cc=guile-user@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).