From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: msematman@myopera.com Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: [ANN] Guile-WM 0.1/Guile XCB 1.1 Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 13:25:29 +0100 Message-ID: <1385987129.902.54411937.311CF1B1@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <87eh9iw7l8.fsf@markwitmer.com> <87haeebxyv.fsf@tines.lan> <87txido2ga.fsf@gmail.com> <87vc2tabrt.fsf@tines.lan> <87sixwe1qi.fsf@markwitmer.com> <87d2p1a7lp.fsf@tines.lan> <878uzowy3w.fsf@honeybear.home> <87eh9f474l.fsf@gmail.com> <874n6uyive.fsf@netris.org> <8761r9b2id.fsf@news.tumashu-localhost.org> <877gbn27ng.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1385987174 11365 80.91.229.3 (2 Dec 2013 12:26:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 12:26:14 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 02 13:26:16 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VnSZn-0005gU-DI for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 13:26:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35848 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VnSZm-0005Y0-D8 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 07:26:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35114) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VnSZC-0005MK-Ol for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 07:25:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VnSZ8-0003eJ-Nx for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 07:25:34 -0500 Original-Received: from momout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.220]:33127) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VnSZ8-0003eD-IF for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 07:25:30 -0500 Original-Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.45]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4DB08E4 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 07:25:29 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from web4 ([10.202.2.214]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 02 Dec 2013 07:25:29 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:date:in-reply-to :references; s=smtpout; bh=1QvMk4DXxaAh39XwrvYSpsuoWfQ=; b=PH2FU 0X8lEWEArZKuXOesI2F17H1ZwSb7u6jdu1XQoFLxzAIu6/G1QxYCPVvxGZGPLbiU tOgD+eBNag7qvJ4bYeXQTFUBxxMHKHCejJo8yZJO8eI72O4+61npggZOsMX8kfla Xz8jsicObpuCokogiRdYVce55GNWLCmYzTSnic= Original-Received: by web4.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id C92521610CA; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 07:25:29 -0500 (EST) X-Sasl-Enc: 6orslOxmOXr+QtAk1IYqgh5QYxkygSlu+K6Buu4i1vuS 1385987129 X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-c41cb995 In-Reply-To: <877gbn27ng.fsf@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 66.111.4.220 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:10910 Archived-At: Seems interesting. I noticed that one of the ideas mentioned on the website was to create a widget set for the wm. I hope this does not mutate into a full-fledged graphical desktop environment :-) . Some of us detest having anything heavier than a wm (such as fluxbox, or stump) on our machines. But, something like a slit would be nice. Even better if you could bolt into it any kind of X program. While I am at it, a tree-like slit would be awesome :-) (container is a container is a container ...) ! Not that I expect anyone to work on this, i just thought of adding my thoughts. On Mon, Dec 2, 2013, at 05:34 AM, mark.d.witmer@gmail.com wrote: > Feng Shu writes: > > > > I am very interested in this project and expect Guile-wm as prowerful > > as awesome and stumpwm! > > > > May be A web page should be build for this project > > > > > > That's an excellent idea. Here are websites for both Guile XCB and > Guile-WM: > > http://www.markwitmer.com/guile-xcb/guile-xcb.html > http://www.markwitmer.com/guile-xcb/guile-wm.html > > I can't say that Guile-WM is as powerful and awesome as StumpWM > yet, but I think it's got lots of potential. > > Thanks > > -- > Mark Witmer > > -- msematman@myopera.com