From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nala Ginrut Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 09:12:43 +0800 Organization: HFG Message-ID: <1375319563.8252.65.camel@Renee-desktop.suse> References: <23837d79-03e3-4792-a4b7-e3a6c96ed390@email.android.com> <20130731102042.GB15597@seid-online.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1375319597 20350 80.91.229.3 (1 Aug 2013 01:13:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 01:13:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org, Alexei Matveev To: Ralf Mattes Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 01 03:13:15 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V4hS5-0006vl-2k for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 03:13:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41089 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V4hS4-00054A-Ef for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 21:13:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38472) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V4hRo-00053f-G0 for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 21:13:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V4hRg-0000dE-1e for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 21:12:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::234]:56141) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V4hRf-0000d6-Sf for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 21:12:48 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id kq13so1494722pab.39 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 18:12:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:content-type:x-mailer:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KwEF4Te5ERbmxW5hVHrYwWkHxWevbAfIqjdNZ6jhW9k=; b=U7y34vvgMFsV0uX5/hzGzBLBiCNfM60U1dshOnc9xGO/qNp29mOsGAe7cpQNeYl02S d/sFmJRueMwyLqictRurcTrSt1wFbLc5jsDakRbTDAPM8XOj+a7+5SrhgOoOTU8f7oHX /DdpfoV+zdhuEszMvrM9KyhHj7gWSPkdQDIyyapTYRUddO7Y1DH/xYGURPZPIOPG7UM6 C/bnAYciyfkl0R2KlnyZ2K+hiECPvke/Y37vm/SyEsrN8EU1/m234AU+WfRyMlD0u4D3 a1XIWo3pjU5JbYhmsvrCTqRbsOo4QmH1qhFXZ9DduUzagmkoRIKxFMQr+xRowBPtuO5R N1Zg== X-Received: by 10.68.234.72 with SMTP id uc8mr83593995pbc.35.1375319567171; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 18:12:47 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [147.2.147.112] ([203.192.156.9]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ue9sm196315pab.7.2013.07.31.18.12.45 for (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 31 Jul 2013 18:12:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130731102042.GB15597@seid-online.de> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::234 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:10598 Archived-At: On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 12:20 +0200, Ralf Mattes wrote: > Isn't the main problem here that the OP assumes that all three languages > have "the same syntax"? This isn't true at all. They share some basic > syntax but any "real" CL/Elisp/Scheme code will use more than this basic > subset. And even within this limited syntactic subset, while one syntax > will work the same syntactic consgruct will have different _semantics_. > > Cheers, Ralf Mattes > Yes, I'm afraid you're right, so I said pre-process is more portable. Anyway, the project based on such an assumption will be very fragile.