From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nala Ginrut Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Anniversary hack: Zile editor with Guile support Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 09:32:20 +0800 Organization: HFG Message-ID: <1364002340.32196.26.camel@Renee-desktop.suse> References: <4CB5C160-9728-4784-ABA1-E8BDFC825990@vaughan.pe> <87k3ozk83q.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1364002360 14306 80.91.229.3 (23 Mar 2013 01:32:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 01:32:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org, "Gary V. Vaughan" To: Ludovic =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 23 02:33:06 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UJDKQ-0005uG-45 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 02:33:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49874 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJDK2-0001Gd-1W for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 21:32:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44187) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJDJt-0001GL-CL for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 21:32:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJDJs-0004It-Fp for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 21:32:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.220.46]:55144) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJDJq-0004IN-CI; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 21:32:26 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id wp1so182113pac.5 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 18:32:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:content-type:x-mailer:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XhPGCeeDXQPhKQl69o3HdlG/PIJm2tW1YAupBVt7yrc=; b=CEcrSOpq1fL+gLJszLEg6/z0nbphRiz7VdOys8EtN2Kcpclpohd0wuZUdnAnsEYAN4 lNVS5POhG+gUAdkQovc6axnqcmSKV+xNh4M9qaxQp8cvyXd0DVxisAdw0y5IG9MnlKb1 wDo16gsT6T+SltQwzQ8ygJmSP7Qnrj0Ok5s1O9tOG2iPGHKrBY1CaeqQJ9VbFx6Du9cu A16bWrFUN98Z9GY8RQc2R9EeU1CGFT+IIcZPle4D+4DqkPOSbHowwnjkLOMOhFjGXMNV YOyQR4ERUhBnofqoSxjE0I4fA7M7baQsJsJppPyRYKeeiCP3K52pBwetMf21DRazYlyE VRNA== X-Received: by 10.66.160.225 with SMTP id xn1mr6395299pab.136.1364002345237; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 18:32:25 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.100.104] ([59.40.200.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id wl14sm4945548pac.18.2013.03.22.18.32.23 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 22 Mar 2013 18:32:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87k3ozk83q.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.220.46 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:10198 Archived-At: On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 12:05 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi Gary, > > "Gary V. Vaughan" skribis: > > > With my limited flirting with Guile in years past, I'm pretty sure the Lua- > > on-Guile work stalled or failed a long time ago. If not, or if it can be > > resurrected, that may be another interesting means to leveraging all the > > recent work on Lua Zile towards making a Guile Emacs by a different route? > > I fail to see how Lua Zile could have anything to do with Guile Emacs. > I don't know if lua-zile is better than guile-emacs, but I'm using current unstable guile-emacs smoothly and all the plugins works for me, though crash sometime. > I’m disappointed that Mike’s Zile-on-Guile has been ignored in favor of > the divisive choice. > I think I'm the only user of zile-on-guile, anyway, I don't care about the decision of upstream. > Ludo’. > >