From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Shann Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: More Guile 1.8 code failing in 2.x Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:54:58 +0000 Message-ID: <1361987698.2097.213.camel@debian-box.lan> References: <1361959643.2097.179.camel@debian-box.lan> <87mwupao7n.fsf@markwitmer.com> <1361974971.2097.194.camel@debian-box.lan> <1361976480.94261.YahooMailNeo@web120406.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1361987762 18372 80.91.229.3 (27 Feb 2013 17:56:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:56:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "mark@markwitmer.com" , "guile-user@gnu.org" To: Mike Gran Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 27 18:56:23 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UAlEt-0003CP-G4 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 18:56:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59552 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAlEV-0004RX-ET for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 12:55:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52749) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAlE7-000475-5f for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 12:55:45 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAlDv-0004uL-7W for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 12:55:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]:51664) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAlDv-0004k8-25 for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 12:55:23 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id 16so683691wgi.15 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 09:55:05 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-proxyuser-ip:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references :content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=8o9zYi4VP9RfNawz8NoW7UUlLLfMC3EAGueMtqHxfeo=; b=APevz+J2MjTopu9rASX3FWdSTnrZTIVGxS51PZRnjNnV5GC9qe9WBuO4Idi4TC1IiG VpdBOZp0t+CDl6mA9agQLReb7rGFK9Za4yIpa7N1Z85ATCUzppCneOvQg96viHWouChs VVcHnI9IpdJoKYjrCV5jNAae14dVfB8FZ2By7rL21YslarljcSZfxixba3Yf3Yn/AQ6x B/jPof6WMrAvB8Z3RA5aGPeVlUzuL/iaeD0Fc5mD57/7KgeeddrtWsk0R47utbYl+Tzu OXmI8VBZzSlC5fqsuO6CgOdhfg6iZn3ZqNeAKj3SKlYaH3GrElmSyR7ESs8MYmOTuy6V FYlg== X-Received: by 10.194.239.202 with SMTP id vu10mr5660452wjc.49.1361987704918; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 09:55:04 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from (know-mailgateway-4.server.virginmedia.net. [62.254.26.109]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m6sm10277339wic.2.2013.02.27.09.55.02 (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 27 Feb 2013 09:55:03 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from source ([146.90.136.35]) by smtp.virginmedia.com with SMTP; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:55:03 +0000 (GMT) X-ProxyUser-IP: 146.90.136.35 In-Reply-To: <1361976480.94261.YahooMailNeo@web120406.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl3VmZwEBaGN5GpY5DGiJjpRwtjefVYMIWxRtPQakmLXhomGI8yZs3LTS/ehdzOAFCCTULn X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 74.125.82.48 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:10151 Archived-At: On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 06:48 -0800, Mike Gran wrote: > > From: Richard Shann > > > > Thanks for this - it seems define-once is not defined in guile 1.8 > > however, so while some systems only have guile 2.0 (Fedora) and others > > only have guile 1.8 (Debian stable) I would need something more. > > Just as an aside... Fedora doesn't have Guile 2.0 at all, except in its > experimental Rawhide distro. Yes, it was the maintainer of Denemo for Fedora that raised a bug about the lack of guile 2.0 support. I guess he was unable to test it for the upcoming release... Richard > It still ships with 1.8. Still about > half of the Guile-using programs in Fedora can't compile with 2.0, so > Fedora will be shipping with both guile-1.8 and 2.0 in the next version, > Fedora 19. Maintainers will be able to link their packages to > either one. The executable for Guile 2.0 will likely be called > /usr/bin/guile2. > > -Mike