From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nala Ginrut Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: libguilereadline load Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 18:03:20 +0800 Organization: HFG Message-ID: <1359713000.3021.20.camel@Renee-desktop.suse> References: <2748570.HcEtJvY3KZ@main> <87r4lc3m4w.fsf@gnu.org> <5077719.ZLBdhZmqem@main> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1359713020 21644 80.91.229.3 (1 Feb 2013 10:03:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 10:03:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: Dmitry Roshchin Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 01 11:03:54 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U1DTL-0003Lw-Am for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 11:03:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39327 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U1DT2-0000yZ-U4 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 05:03:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51871) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U1DSy-0000yR-AC for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 05:03:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U1DSw-0001LT-Dg for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 05:03:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f41.google.com ([209.85.220.41]:41381) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U1DSw-0001LG-8K for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 05:03:26 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id fb11so357391pad.14 for ; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 02:03:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:content-type:x-mailer:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=OHva/mYJvSDcSV8joh9xzjWOrQmqn1lIJiApsk/JR6c=; b=WkHAQw2OzIbOuYgnvLSx1KHhCkAhuWILusKTD419J59iknSqjDaOSW9ZSrvz9RK0qJ J/eybEEPz7zyMjpjYPl6BfhmKVYxSFNdylkjPveaYqjva9y+UmEW9mPXqTtOdWcxPHLs rC6lRglDNNFvcFjeWz5Px+bR/8pGdYjkdpO76AGHFeCHh6feJLaml5nQwN4SN3zdlCAn 1weHspxOJAqKNXPa9sRehr03YhJwjZnUjFLlcXFSWXChCuEMSVCEz8QQZbEq/UkRoVmt XvDalgqv41wbXzzJp3OsE/2DQNI2eWJ5RtkWSSytK83xIZUdMM5uBVJ4y6gO+J0eO4zt Duog== X-Received: by 10.66.88.37 with SMTP id bd5mr28292095pab.75.1359713005495; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 02:03:25 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [147.2.147.112] ([61.14.130.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id qb3sm7994848pbb.35.2013.02.01.02.03.22 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Feb 2013 02:03:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5077719.ZLBdhZmqem@main> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.220.41 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:9970 Archived-At: On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 13:52 +0400, Dmitry Roshchin wrote: > On Tuesday 22 January 2013 23:09:51 Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Dmitry Roshchin skribis: > > > Is it normal, that guile tries to load "libguilereadline-v-18.so" instead > > > of "libguilereadline-v-18.so.18"? Guile version - 2.0.7. > > > > You normally have both, as well as libguilereadline-v-18.la, no? > > > > Guile uses ltdl for dynamic loading (info "(libtool) Using libltdl"). > > The rule is to first search for .la files. The .la file tells ltdl that > > the real library is the .so.18 file, which ltdl then loads. > > > > When the .la file is missing, ltdl tries the .so file instead (not the > > .so.18 file). > > > > openSUSE packaging policy requires to remove .la files. And .so file is > contained in guile-devel package. So it doesn't work by default. > And actually, even Fedora remove *.la too: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines @ludo: Is there any chance to fix it? Folks have to install -devel packages to run Guile, or there's no *.so file.