From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Smith Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Errors using Guile 2.0 vs. Guile 1.8 Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:42:04 -0500 Organization: GNU's Not Unix! Message-ID: <1327887724.3401.38.camel@homebase> References: <1327852458.3401.10.camel@homebase> <87ty3ejgbx.fsf@netris.org> <87lioqjevm.fsf@netris.org> <1327882677.3401.37.camel@homebase> <8762fuj8gz.fsf@netris.org> Reply-To: psmith@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327887742 10240 80.91.229.3 (30 Jan 2012 01:42:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 01:42:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 30 02:42:17 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RrgG8-0005bn-Eo for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 02:42:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46322 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrgG7-0005M9-VN for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:42:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43532) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrgG3-0005M4-Sd for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:42:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrgG0-0006XE-3l for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:42:11 -0500 Original-Received: from oproxy4-pub.bluehost.com ([69.89.21.11]:44223) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrgFz-0006X8-OC for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:42:07 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 8788 invoked by uid 0); 30 Jan 2012 01:42:06 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO box531.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.131) by cpoproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 30 Jan 2012 01:42:06 -0000 Original-Received: from 146-115-71-23.c3-0.lex-ubr1.sbo-lex.ma.cable.rcn.com ([146.115.71.23] helo=[172.31.1.105]) by box531.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (SSLv3:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RrgFy-0004uR-1P; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:42:06 -0700 In-Reply-To: <8762fuj8gz.fsf@netris.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Identified-User: {678:box531.bluehost.com:madscie1:mad-scientist.us} {sentby:smtp auth 146.115.71.23 authed with paul+mad-scientist.us} X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 69.89.21.11 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:9216 Archived-At: On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 20:16 -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote: > I think it would almost certainly be fine to map variable objects to > "", because I can't imagine why anyone would ever want to return a > variable object to 'make'. OK, I made this change. Thanks! -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul D. Smith Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.mad-scientist.net "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist