From: Paul Smith <psmith@gnu.org>
To: Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@gnuvola.org>
Cc: guile-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Using guile as an extension language for GNU make
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:02:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1316545329.28907.207.camel@homebase> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1316539888.28907.201.camel@homebase>
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 13:31 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> > In Scheme, w/ SRFI 13, you could express this as:
> >
> > This is not so tricky, i think.
>
> Heh, cute!
Thinking about this more it occurs to me that I will likely need a
module defined for any GNU make specific procedures I write to avoid
namespace pollution.
What do people think would be an appropriate module name?
I was thinking something like "gnu make" would be OK, but maybe there
are already conventions for applications/application-specific module
hierarchies that I should be following?
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Smith <psmith@gnu.org> Find some GNU make tips at:
http://www.gnu.org http://make.mad-scientist.net
"Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-20 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-18 0:10 Using guile as an extension language for GNU make Paul Smith
2011-09-18 12:10 ` Ludovic Courtès
2011-09-18 17:21 ` Embedding vs. Extending (was: Re: Using guile as an extension language for GNU make) Paul Smith
2011-09-18 21:48 ` Embedding vs. Extending Ludovic Courtès
2011-09-18 17:42 ` Using guile as an extension language for GNU make Paul Smith
2011-09-18 21:28 ` Ludovic Courtès
2011-09-18 15:30 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2011-09-18 19:28 ` Paul Smith
2011-09-19 0:28 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2011-09-19 15:14 ` Paul Smith
2011-09-19 19:41 ` Hans Aberg
2011-09-19 21:56 ` Paul Smith
2011-09-19 22:35 ` Hans Aberg
2011-09-19 23:00 ` Hans Aberg
2011-09-21 2:42 ` Mark H Weaver
2011-09-21 8:24 ` Hans Aberg
2011-09-20 16:17 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2011-09-20 17:31 ` Paul Smith
2011-09-20 19:02 ` Paul Smith [this message]
2011-09-21 0:48 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2011-09-20 20:39 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1316545329.28907.207.camel@homebase \
--to=psmith@gnu.org \
--cc=guile-user@gnu.org \
--cc=ttn@gnuvola.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).