From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Germ=E1n?= Arias Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Problems to install Guile 2.0.0 Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 19:44:37 -0600 Message-ID: <1299721477.6397.4.camel@german-desktop> References: <1299610640.12945.1.camel@german-desktop> <87d3m1e0dq.fsf@gnu.org> <1299628449.5606.1.camel@german-desktop> <874o7dxf5j.fsf@netris.org> <1299646205.5625.2.camel@german-desktop> <87sjuwx4j7.fsf@netris.org> <1299652935.9308.1.camel@german-desktop> <87r5agvfpk.fsf@netris.org> <1299703377.5627.6.camel@german-desktop> <878vwoko32.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> Reply-To: german@xelalug.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1299721511 8792 80.91.229.12 (10 Mar 2011 01:45:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 01:45:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Mark H Weaver , Ludovic =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= , guile-user@gnu.org To: Neil Jerram Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 10 02:45:06 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PxUw5-0008A7-6Z for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 02:45:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44252 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PxUw4-0006gi-RS for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 20:45:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59667 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PxUvl-0006dj-GF for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 20:44:46 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PxUvk-0005Ff-Ga for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 20:44:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-vx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.220.169]:65020) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PxUvi-0005FO-UT; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 20:44:42 -0500 Original-Received: by vxc38 with SMTP id 38so1381401vxc.0 for ; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 17:44:41 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.52.69.197 with SMTP id g5mr10571494vdu.31.1299721481658; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 17:44:41 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.5] ([190.56.99.213]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id eh10sm1807628vbb.12.2011.03.09.17.44.39 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 09 Mar 2011 17:44:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <878vwoko32.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.220.169 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:8511 Archived-At: OK, I solved the problem. Checking the files vm.c, vm.s,... . I found the character at file vm.c. I remember some time ago I had a compilation problem caused by this character in a file. However, this character not always cause problems. I removed all occurrences of this character in vm.c, and that was the solution :) Thank you all for your help. On mié, 2011-03-09 at 20:58 +0000, Neil Jerram wrote: > Germán Arias writes: > > > Output for gcc --version: > > > > german@german-desktop:~$ gcc --version > > gcc (GCC) 4.2.4 (Ubuntu 4.2.4-1ubuntu3) > > Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is > > NO > > warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR > > PURPOSE. > > Hi Germán, > > Just in case it's not already obvious to you, the thing that's really > weird here is that compilation apparently fails but without displaying > any kind of detailed error message. This is practically unheard of, and > I don't recall any similar case in previous Guile-related reports. > > That's why we're all asking questions - which may seem strange to you - > about your exact compiler, platform and so on. > > So, basically, if there's anything you can do to get the compiler to > print more information about why it is failing, that would help. > > Regards, > Neil