From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Romel Sandoval Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Guile base64 Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:15:58 -0500 Message-ID: <1283544958.4017.4.camel@romel-compaq> References: <1283364621.2401.8.camel@romel-compaq> <87fwxsftsu.fsf@gnu.org> <871v9blnyr.fsf@delenn.lan> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283544992 21555 80.91.229.12 (3 Sep 2010 20:16:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 20:16:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andy Wingo , Ludovic =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= , guile-user@gnu.org To: Andreas Rottmann Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 03 22:16:30 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OrcgX-000693-DM for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 22:16:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35303 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OrcgO-0000Jy-Pp for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:16:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54921 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Orcg8-0000Jj-3f for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:16:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Orcg6-0003us-S9 for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:16:04 -0400 Original-Received: from karen.lavabit.com ([72.249.41.33]:42744) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Orcg6-0003ue-Nl; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from b.earth.lavabit.com (b.earth.lavabit.com [192.168.111.11]) by karen.lavabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EF5F24ED86; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:16:01 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from 148.209.128.70 (dsl-201-155-81-234-sta.prod-empresarial.com.mx [201.155.81.234]) by lavabit.com with ESMTP id J9C7Z9OIBFGO; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:16:01 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lavabit; d=lavabit.com; b=Sm50hPOV+FYV7tFrhzUlccAZFg822NDQvmByf8mmWkeRAWfHn4DRYR/6s7p7WZLVro5jIiH6hsEUWQJ4y/MsVua+J+YejmpyzK8NEmHXoMriN9f7AqLB5Q9FyUc3y9QFpnWbtF7/fSyC9WalIRRkNOoG+zdWHtpu4GEN976/FGk=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date:Message-ID:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:Content-Transfer-Encoding; In-Reply-To: <871v9blnyr.fsf@delenn.lan> X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:8150 Archived-At: El vie, 03-09-2010 a las 01:34 +0200, Andreas Rottmann escribi=C3=B3: > Andy Wingo writes: >=20 > > Greets, > > > > On Thu 02 Sep 2010 01:12, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > > > >> Romel Sandoval writes: > >> > >>> What happened to base64 library on Guile recent versions? > > > > There is=20 > > > > http://gitorious.com/tekuti/tekuti/blobs/master/tekuti/base64.scm > > > Also the R6RS version, which should probably work in Guile as well (and > it is defmacro-free ;-). >=20 > http://gitorious.org/tekuti/tekuti/blobs/t/r6rs/do-port/tekuti/base6= 4.sls >=20 > [ I really need to make another pass over Tekuti, now that Guile has > R6RS support -- this could bring the versions a good deal closer > together. ] >=20 > Regards, Rotty Do you think any of mentioned implementations should be included with Guile 2.0 or it's better to keep it apart? Regards, Romel