From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Kevin Brott" Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Guile 1.8.2 Compile Error [GAH] Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:28:57 -0800 Organization: Providence Health and Services Message-ID: <1195072137.24926.4.camel@vanguard.or.providence.org> References: <107476.82904.qm@web37904.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Reply-To: kevin.brott@providence.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1195072165 25982 80.91.229.12 (14 Nov 2007 20:29:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 20:29:25 +0000 (UTC) To: "Guile-User" Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 14 21:29:27 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IsOrX-0002E4-2o for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:29:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IsOrK-0005rH-69 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:29:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IsOrD-0005p8-8O for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:29:07 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IsOr9-0005jP-Tm for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:29:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IsOr9-0005ii-I0 for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:29:03 -0500 Original-Received: from phsor-nat2.providence.org ([170.220.2.14]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IsOr7-0002YN-6b for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:29:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mail pickup service by phsor-nat2.providence.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:28:58 -0800 X-KryptiqSpooler: Handled Original-Received: from WNP0620K.or.providence.org ([170.220.65.132]) by phsor-nat2.providence.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:28:58 -0800 thread-index: Acgm/Pt6IecR8C4hTfydB3JEpiaAhw== Original-Received: from wn1218.or.providence.org ([170.220.66.246]) by WNP0620K.or.providence.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:28:57 -0800 Original-Received: from 170.220.75.108 ([170.220.75.108]) by wn1218.or.providence.org ([170.220.66.246]) via Exchange Front-End Server email.providence.org ([170.220.65.142]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 20:28:58 +0000 Original-Received: from vanguard by email.providence.org; 14 Nov 2007 12:28:58 -0800 In-Reply-To: <107476.82904.qm@web37904.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Priority: normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2992 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Nov 2007 20:28:57.0233 (UTC) FILETIME=[FB739810:01C826FC] X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1+ X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:6286 Archived-At: On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 11:17 -0800, Mike Gran wrote: > You are correct. There is a value in that macro called "_Complex_I" = that is, for some reason, being processed down to "__I", losing the word = "Complex". >=20 > What if you replace "_Complex_I" with "(0.0 + 1.0i)" ? >=20 > Good Luck, >=20 > Mike Gran Replacing "_Complex_I" with "(0.0 + 1.0i)" and doing a fresh compile works - with the caveat that I had to remove -Werror from configure-generated CFLAGS to get past the type-punned warning. Now I need to figure out WTH is wrong with the AIX that _Complex_I is dereferencing as __I when the notes in that file clearly state that __I shouldn't ever be called directly. --=20 #include /* Kevin Brott =20 * Unix Systems Engineer - SA Group - Provtech * Providence Health Systems, Tigard, OR */ DISCLAIMER: This message is intended for the sole use of the addressee, and may = contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from = disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee you are = hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose, or distribute to = anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you = have received this message in error, please immediately advise the = sender by reply email and delete this message. _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user