From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Aaron VanDevender Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: guile-gnome and guile-gtk Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 21:47:59 -0600 Message-ID: <1140493679.29123.31.camel@vandvndr.physics.uiuc.edu> References: <1140459657.29123.21.camel@vandvndr.physics.uiuc.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1140509787 26900 80.91.229.2 (21 Feb 2006 08:16:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 08:16:27 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 21 09:16:25 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FBSh6-0007fM-0L for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:16:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FBSd8-0005FG-BU for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 03:12:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FBOaO-00049I-0R for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:53:12 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FBOVg-0007Le-HB for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:48:22 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FBOVN-0006gu-Ej for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:48:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [130.126.11.93] (helo=vandvndr.physics.uiuc.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FBObY-0006cb-6J for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:54:24 -0500 Original-Received: from vandvndr.physics.uiuc.edu (vandvndr.physics.uiuc.edu [127.0.0.1]) by vandvndr.physics.uiuc.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1L3m0V8026982 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 21:48:00 -0600 Original-Received: (from sig@localhost) by vandvndr.physics.uiuc.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1L3m0wG026981 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 21:48:00 -0600 X-Authentication-Warning: vandvndr.physics.uiuc.edu: sig set sender to sig@netdot.net using -f Original-To: guile-user@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <1140459657.29123.21.camel@vandvndr.physics.uiuc.edu> X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:5175 Archived-At: I should have qualified that to say that guile-gtk doesn't build due to the autoconf thing. guile-gnome is based on pkg-config (and gtk2) But my question stands? Is anyone working on them? Are we waiting for g-wrap 2.0? Or have people lost interest? -Aaron On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 12:20 -0600, Aaron VanDevender wrote: > Is guile-gnome a dead project? It has been almost a year since the last > release, and there hasn't been much traffic on the guile-gnome list. Is > anyone planning a gtk2 based version of gulie-gtk and guile-gnome? > > The last version doesn't even build on my system because it uses > autoconf macros which are based on -config scripts and everything has > since moved over to pkgconfig. > > > -- sig@netdot.net Plead the First. _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user