From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Roland Orre Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: sudden snarf-problem Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 16:53:04 +0200 Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <1090162384.6164.4.camel@localhost> References: <1090152630.21651.15.camel@localhost> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1090162505 21058 80.91.224.253 (18 Jul 2004 14:55:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 14:55:05 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 18 16:54:56 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BmD44-0001te-00 for ; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 16:54:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BmD6h-0007Ct-Jr for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 10:57:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BmD6d-0007CN-BG for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 10:57:35 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BmD6a-0007Bl-Qe for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 10:57:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BmD6a-0007Bi-Oi for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 10:57:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.54.107.73] (helo=mxfep02.bredband.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BmD3Z-0007Xj-AE for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 10:54:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [10.1.2.4] ([213.112.87.111] [213.112.87.111]) by mxfep02.bredband.com with ESMTP id <20040718145424.YTWQ23867.mxfep02.bredband.com@[10.1.2.4]> for ; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 16:54:24 +0200 Original-To: guile-user@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <1090152630.21651.15.camel@localhost> X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:3331 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:3331 The problem seems not to be snarf as such, it seems to be me, who has come to believe that I can declare SCM_PROC over more than one row. It showed that the actual reason the compiler didn't complain was that I had changed the compiler to gcc-3.* and this compiler didn't complain about the missing semicolons in the .x file (usually I'm running 2.95). On Sun, 2004-07-18 at 14:10, Roland Orre wrote: > Suddenly semicolons were missing for each declaration in the > .x file where the SCM_PROC was declared over more than one line > in the source. > > Any idea what can be the cause? > > I haven't updated my guile for quite some time, but the system, > as I'm running debian/unstable. > > The snarf command looks OK: > /usr/local/guile/guile-1.7/libguile/guile-snarf -o user.x user.c \ > -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -O2 -I/usr/local/guile/guile-1.7/include > /Roland Orre _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user