* Re: Returned mail: see transcript for details [not found] <200212262346.gBQNkaNc029823@smtp.nada.kth.se> @ 2002-12-26 23:50 ` Roland Orre 2002-12-27 0:02 ` Found a bug in guile 1.6.0 Roland Orre 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Roland Orre @ 2002-12-26 23:50 UTC (permalink / raw) > On Fri, 2002-12-27 at 00:08, Marius Vollmer wrote: > <snip> > The best solution is not to use procedure->macro. Use define-macro > (or defmacro) or define-syntax. > <snip> > You could try > (define-macro (push! stack obj) > `(set! ,stack (cons ,obj ,stack))) > <snip> Thanks, that macro definition works fine. I did, however, as this macro is used in several places in my code, just convert it to a SCM_SYNTAX which also solved the problem. The problem occured when I was checking my old code for our recent conversion to guile 1.6. In most places the old procedure->macro worked well though. > (Just curious: where did you learn about procedure->macro? we don't > want people to use it.) It's a remaining in my code from around 1990, long before guile, when I was a heavily scm (which guile is based upon) user. It seems as I should try to adapt to the new macros :) Thanks once again! Best regards Roland _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Found a bug in guile 1.6.0 2002-12-26 23:50 ` Returned mail: see transcript for details Roland Orre @ 2002-12-27 0:02 ` Roland Orre 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Roland Orre @ 2002-12-27 0:02 UTC (permalink / raw) On Fri, 2002-12-27 at 00:08, Marius Vollmer wrote: <snip> > The best solution is not to use procedure->macro. Use define-macro > (or defmacro) or define-syntax. <snip> > You could try > (define-macro (push! stack obj) > `(set! ,stack (cons ,obj ,stack))) <snip> Thanks, that macro definition works fine. I did, however, as this macro is used in several places in my code, just convert it to a SCM_SYNTAX which also solved the problem. The problem occured when I was checking my old code for our recent conversion to guile 1.6. In most places the old procedure->macro worked well though. > (Just curious: where did you learn about procedure->macro? we don't > want people to use it.) It's a remaining in my code from around 1990, long before guile, when I was a heavily scm (which guile is based upon) user. It seems as I should try to adapt to the new macros :) Thanks once again! Best regards Roland _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-12-27 0:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <200212262346.gBQNkaNc029823@smtp.nada.kth.se>
2002-12-26 23:50 ` Returned mail: see transcript for details Roland Orre
2002-12-27 0:02 ` Found a bug in guile 1.6.0 Roland Orre
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).