Re: Returned mail: see transcript for details

Re: Returned mail: see transcript for details

[Roland Orre]

> On Fri, 2002-12-27 at 00:08, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> <snip>
> The best solution is not to use procedure->macro.  Use define-macro
> (or defmacro) or define-syntax.
> <snip>
> You could try
>   (define-macro (push! stack obj)
>     `(set! ,stack (cons ,obj ,stack)))
> <snip>

Thanks, that macro definition works fine. I did, however, as this macro
is used in several places in my code, just convert it to a SCM_SYNTAX
which also solved the problem. The problem occured when I was checking
my old code for our recent conversion to guile 1.6. In most places the
old procedure->macro worked well though.

> (Just curious: where did you learn about procedure->macro?  we don't
> want people to use it.)

It's a remaining in my code from around 1990, long before guile, when I
was a heavily scm (which guile is based upon) user.

It seems as I should try to adapt to the new macros :)
Thanks once again!

        Best regards
        Roland




_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user

Re: Found a bug in guile 1.6.0

[Roland Orre]

On Fri, 2002-12-27 at 00:08, Marius Vollmer wrote:
<snip>
>  The best solution is not to use procedure->macro.  Use define-macro
>  (or defmacro) or define-syntax.
<snip>

>  You could try
>    (define-macro (push! stack obj)
>      `(set! ,stack (cons ,obj ,stack)))
<snip>

Thanks, that macro definition works fine. I did, however, as this macro
is used in several places in my code, just convert it to a SCM_SYNTAX
which also solved the problem. The problem occured when I was checking
my old code for our recent conversion to guile 1.6. In most places the
old procedure->macro worked well though.

> (Just curious: where did you learn about procedure->macro?  we don't
> want people to use it.)

It's a remaining in my code from around 1990, long before guile, when I
was a heavily scm (which guile is based upon) user.

It seems as I should try to adapt to the new macros :)
Thanks once again!

        Best regards
        Roland



_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user