From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E9r=E9my?= Korwin-Zmijowski Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: srfi-64 tests passing when they should not Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 12:15:07 +0200 Message-ID: <0eb1d990980678a000fa314c81715f5336e91f28.camel@korwin-zmijowski.fr> References: <40a496bb-c005-3c6f-2bf2-7025f3a234bb@posteo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15218"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.4-0ubuntu1 To: Zelphir Kaltstahl , Guile User Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 04 12:30:42 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ldsK9-0003qx-ES for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 12:30:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57792 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ldsK8-0001oO-G0 for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 06:30:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57060) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lds5F-0001yA-Cy for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 06:15:19 -0400 Original-Received: from relay11.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.231]:37745) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lds5B-0001Ux-Gi for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 06:15:17 -0400 Original-Received: from elite (unknown [83.118.200.115]) (Authenticated sender: jeremy@korwin-zmijowski.fr) by relay11.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 50AA210001A; Tue, 4 May 2021 10:15:08 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <40a496bb-c005-3c6f-2bf2-7025f3a234bb@posteo.de> Received-SPF: none client-ip=217.70.178.231; envelope-from=jeremy@korwin-zmijowski.fr; helo=relay11.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.user:17510 Archived-At: Hey Zelphir ! I think it is related to something I noticed few monthes ago : https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-user/2021-02/msg00061.html I cross posted the message over here : https://srfi-email.schemers.org/srfi-64/msg/16101182/ I got no responses from SRFI-64 mailing list. I think, when an expression throws an exception, it also returns #f. Unfortunately, you expect #f as well in your test. Jérémy