From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Maxime Devos Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Question about an error with ports Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 20:48:27 +0100 Message-ID: <0bb10bc0517975226fbc42bdc36147def27c90b0.camel@telenet.be> References: <3f938fe1-9af4-9076-8d50-d1f7b2ddda36@posteo.de> <87ilslc0gn.fsf@laura> <87fsnpbcbp.fsf@laura> <20220311120500.ad94ea6ad79068dc1f8ff85d@gmail.com> <87czisbkng.fsf@laura> <20220311172650.aeab7bf504b38992196e0141@gmail.com> <20220311181317.eddaee41c7293abb432c8321@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-5yBQ26F01jgYPWae98MA" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12289"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1 To: Chris Vine , guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 11 20:50:29 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nSlHR-00032R-UE for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 20:50:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50924 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nSlHQ-0001FI-HI for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 14:50:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57006) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nSlFf-0000Da-Pi for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 14:48:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [2a02:1800:120:4::f00:15] (port=33114 helo=andre.telenet-ops.be) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nSlFd-0000Ds-Cv for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 14:48:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [172.20.10.5] ([188.189.148.146]) by andre.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id 57oZ2700439lH3w017oa0e; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 20:48:34 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20220311181317.eddaee41c7293abb432c8321@gmail.com> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r22; t=1647028114; bh=MM+yK3vEHl3V6T7fyA5lm+Y2wndu3SfdWNd8bk5c44M=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=AyTD01b/q8g4Y2EQWeHhTh+7h96dNtZN+KWVk/Ch31YkU2CmsLtc8yLrNQQ/YlSRN 8H+f10Dr+fG6iX1ipb69DHSeW1ECSsF+RhAMp9iznb3LdJE381j8sNMiyswsuRcRJv d5FCxxQq4F7+cKSRGAji5fr8C70LcwfXE9sayBSEPg7bdMGGddN29Gvas75WMytkdq A8oeJFWGN/0Jdpf4WnR/MJSRpT6G7Ig7Ixtumk6oCbJsel7S/23oUuW5mtd9HPV7ar Xwti08yvYGLbiaXM2rrUhNTmYmVBGPdLq8v+YfHB0IbvfLEteffBIKm63ultxa60dA 8o8utsgk+CzSw== X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a02:1800:120:4::f00:15 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:1800:120:4::f00:15; envelope-from=maximedevos@telenet.be; helo=andre.telenet-ops.be X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.user:18193 Archived-At: --=-5yBQ26F01jgYPWae98MA Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chris Vine schreef op vr 11-03-2022 om 18:13 [+0000]: > Interestingly the read procedure remains unsafe in guile-2.2.6, but > seems to be safe in guile-3.0.8 even though I cannot see what in the This is probably due to the rewrite of the 'read' procedure in Scheme (see module/ice-9/read.scm (cannot be imported as a module)). There's still a C version of the read procedure, but as I understand it it is only for bootstrapping (and maybe performance, I dunno). Greetings, Maxime. --=-5yBQ26F01jgYPWae98MA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYiunixccbWF4aW1lZGV2 b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7l+RAQD/ePgoxzXm6Dq7DV3OPQuO4BGh Fny4k9X8LO4WpDOI7gEA0cV1Kn8K45VQLO0gUUX6WytLVtuGh/IHKzJl6gIqigE= =hsmT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-5yBQ26F01jgYPWae98MA--