unofficial mirror of guile-user@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Wette <matt.wette@gmail.com>
To: Christopher Howard <christopher.howard@qlfiles.net>
Cc: Guile User Mailing List <guile-user@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Signals / Messages / Events / ...?
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 17:16:54 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0A9711D5-6E93-4DC1-A3D9-F1313AE150CD@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1514956159.4049.2.camel@qlfiles.net>


> On Jan 2, 2018, at 9:09 PM, Christopher Howard <christopher.howard@qlfiles.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi list, forgive me if this is a somewhat vague question... but is
> there some kind of framework/system/approach for Guile where you could
> have different parts of your code register callback functions to react
> to a certain signal or message raised by any other part of the code?
> I'm thinking like dbus where I guess you can sort of send off a message
> but not really care who receives it. In chickadee you can register
> callbacks for the various input events, and i think that basic idea
> could be extended so long as (1) you could have any kind of
> event/signal you wanted; (2) call backs added could be specified as
> either persistent or one-time call-backs.
> 
> It seems like it wouldn't be too hard to code something like that with
> just lists of callback functions tied to names/data in a tree. But
> maybe somebody has already thought of that or would suggest a better
> approach.
> 
> Just running into this challenge in development where a function like
> "new-game" has to do 8 different things to 6 different data structures,
> but why not instead just have the code dealing with the 6 different
> objects register callbacks to receive the 'new-game signal? I think
> message passing is the wrong term because in message passing you
> specify the message connections between the different objects, right?
> Signal bus maybe?
> 
> -- 
> http://upgradefromwindows.com

If you are on Linux you can look at fibers:
https://github.com/wingo/fibers <https://github.com/wingo/fibers>

it is lightweight processes with message passing.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2018-01-04  1:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-03  5:09 Signals / Messages / Events / ...? Christopher Howard
2018-01-03 11:53 ` Neil Jerram
2018-01-03 15:11   ` Christopher Howard
2018-01-03 19:53     ` Neil Jerram
2018-01-04  1:16 ` Matt Wette [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0A9711D5-6E93-4DC1-A3D9-F1313AE150CD@gmail.com \
    --to=matt.wette@gmail.com \
    --cc=christopher.howard@qlfiles.net \
    --cc=guile-user@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).