From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mikael Djurfeldt Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: min, max one complex arg Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:20:56 -0500 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87vfm7vok7.fsf@zip.com.au> Reply-To: djurfeldt@nada.kth.se NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1076948698 30634 80.91.224.253 (16 Feb 2004 16:24:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 16:24:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: djurfeldt@nada.kth.se Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 16 17:24:35 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AslXv-0006Pz-00 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 17:24:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AslXE-00036J-4r for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:23:52 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AslVN-0002TW-7p for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:21:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AslUl-0002DX-LW for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:21:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [213.212.20.77] (helo=kvast.blakulla.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AslUk-0002D2-Uw for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:21:19 -0500 Original-Received: from chunk.mit.edu ([18.42.2.92] helo=chunk ident=Debian-exim) by kvast.blakulla.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AslUf-0006WZ-00; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 17:21:14 +0100 Original-Received: from mdj by chunk with local (Exim 4.30) id 1AslUO-0004O1-K0; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:20:56 -0500 Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87vfm7vok7.fsf@zip.com.au> (Kevin Ryde's message of "Mon, 16 Feb 2004 10:46:32 +1000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3388 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3388 Kevin Ryde writes: > I noticed min and max on a single complex number argument return it > unchanged, (min 1+i) => 1+i, but for two complex args it dispatches to > the g_min/g_max generics. > > Should it dispatch for the one arg case too, so as to confine the > builtin code to int/big/frac/real? Yes. It's strange to have (min "+i") but not (min +i) dispatch... M _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel