* min, max one complex arg
@ 2004-02-16 0:46 Kevin Ryde
2004-02-16 16:20 ` Mikael Djurfeldt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Ryde @ 2004-02-16 0:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
I noticed min and max on a single complex number argument return it
unchanged, (min 1+i) => 1+i, but for two complex args it dispatches to
the g_min/g_max generics.
Should it dispatch for the one arg case too, so as to confine the
builtin code to int/big/frac/real?
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: min, max one complex arg
2004-02-16 0:46 min, max one complex arg Kevin Ryde
@ 2004-02-16 16:20 ` Mikael Djurfeldt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mikael Djurfeldt @ 2004-02-16 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: djurfeldt
Kevin Ryde <user42@zip.com.au> writes:
> I noticed min and max on a single complex number argument return it
> unchanged, (min 1+i) => 1+i, but for two complex args it dispatches to
> the g_min/g_max generics.
>
> Should it dispatch for the one arg case too, so as to confine the
> builtin code to int/big/frac/real?
Yes. It's strange to have (min "+i") but not (min +i) dispatch...
M
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-02-16 16:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-02-16 0:46 min, max one complex arg Kevin Ryde
2004-02-16 16:20 ` Mikael Djurfeldt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).