unofficial mirror of guile-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mikael Djurfeldt <djurfeldt@nada.kth.se>
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: for-each and varargs
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 13:43:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xy7adh4l310.fsf@nada.kth.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87of5lf5r5.fsf@zip.com.au> (Kevin Ryde's message of "Mon, 10 Feb 2003 08:28:46 +1000")

Kevin Ryde <user42@zip.com.au> writes:

> In the latest cvs built on a recent i386 debian, for-each doesn't
> always seem to like a procedure taking a variable number of arguments.
> For instance foo.scm,
>
>     (for-each (lambda (x . y) (display x))
>               '(1 2 3))
>
> run with "guile -s foo.scm" gives
>
>     ERROR: In procedure for-each:
>     ERROR: Wrong type argument in position 1: #<procedure #f (x . y)>
>
> whereas I hoped it would display `123'.

* eval.c (scm_trampoline_0, scm_trampoline_1, scm_trampoline_2):
Fixed formals tests for closures.  (Thanks to Kevin Ryde.)

Silly me.  I've been a bit careless when implementing this one.

> Curiously this is what it does when run interatively, not with
> "guile -s".

That's because "guile -s" uses the "normal" evaluator by default.
for-each doesn't use an optimized strategy when the debugging
evaluator is active.  This is to get a more informative backtrace.

Best regards,
Mikael D.


_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel


      reply	other threads:[~2003-02-10 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-09 22:28 for-each and varargs Kevin Ryde
2003-02-10 12:43 ` Mikael Djurfeldt [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xy7adh4l310.fsf@nada.kth.se \
    --to=djurfeldt@nada.kth.se \
    --cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).