From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mikael Djurfeldt Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: frisk versus srfi-1 filter Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 10:18:38 +0100 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <873cldog5i.fsf@zip.com.au> Reply-To: djurfeldt@nada.kth.se NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1048497590 14089 80.91.224.249 (24 Mar 2003 09:19:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 09:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 24 10:19:48 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18xO7P-0003ew-00 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 10:19:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18xO6l-0004t1-04 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 04:19:07 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18xO6V-0004rw-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 04:18:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18xO6T-0004pt-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 04:18:50 -0500 Original-Received: from kvast.blakulla.net ([213.212.20.77]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18xO6T-0004oh-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 04:18:49 -0500 Original-Received: from dyna224-219.nada.kth.se ([130.237.224.219] helo=linnaeus) by kvast.blakulla.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18xO6L-00035V-00; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 10:18:41 +0100 Original-Received: from mdj by linnaeus with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18xO6I-0006Ye-00; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 10:18:38 +0100 Original-To: Kevin Ryde In-Reply-To: <873cldog5i.fsf@zip.com.au> (Kevin Ryde's message of "Mon, 24 Mar 2003 08:46:17 +1000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) Original-cc: djurfeldt@nada.kth.se X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2107 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2107 Kevin Ryde writes: > In the current cvs, I noticed the recent change to remove "filter" > from (srfi srfi-1) has broken frisk. For instance, > > guile-tools frisk > > produces > > ERROR: no binding `filter' in module (srfi srfi-1) > > I guess scripts/frisk can be updated easily enough, but if an > application might be doing something similar then I wonder if srfi-1 > could provide an alias for filter somehow, for compatibility. Certainly. And this exposes other latent bugs. Some bindings in srfi-1 (such as 'cons') are implemented in the core. Until now, we've simply omitted those bindings from the export list of the srfi-1 module. 'filter' was recently turned into a primitive, and therefore also removed from the export list of srfi-1. The "frisk" script correctly uses :select to explicitly ask for the binding "filter" in srfi-1. Of course people should be able to do this for *all* bindings of srfi-1, which means that we must re-export all core bindings. guile-tools frisk should work now. 2003-03-24 Mikael Djurfeldt * srfi-1.scm: Re-export all srfi-1 bindings implemented by the core. (Thanks to Kevin Ryde.) _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel